Jane Fonda recommends civil disobedience and rebellion on behalf of Greta Thunberg in order to fight

a reply to: carewemust

As Trump has shown us, anybody can run for President, and win.
It is cowardice to have others fight your battles as the elites have shown.
If she were serious about wanting to change this world, she should run for President. We all know how that would turn out. So yeah. That's Jane "give the POW help note to the POW camp director" Fonda.
That lady has Hilary written all over her, if that lets you understand the chance's, of her winning the Presidency, any better.

I always look to Hollywood for scientific and political advice. Those folks are grounded in the reality of everyday life for the common man and know all about politics and what is good for those not living in their neighborhood. Jane was always a favorite and has provided me with help in selecting a new backyard AA gun to help me protest something or other. Now she and little Greta are pals because they are both experts in climatology and not because Antifa Greta is getting the attention that Jane wants.

twg2a.files.wordpress.com...

a reply to: strongfp

The fact that celebrities are behind Thunberg whom has a high social status now vs. Boyan Slat. Celebrities like Schwarzenegger, DiCaprio, Fonda or Danson. All who have yachts, private planes plastic in their bodies. Slat is leading by example knowing it's a long haul and spent his young years developing a collection system that is a very need to have system.

Folks want to give Greta a Nobel peace prize for speaking at the U.N. and likely never heard of Boyan Slat who took the proactive approach.

"Do as I say, not as I do"

Is our only home important? Heck yes it is. Recycle, drive less. Do your part. You bought a Gatorade.... re-use it with water. I do, clean it, re-use it as long as you can and recycle it again.

If people really want a lesson, go live with a tribe of indigenous people. Or Pennsylvania has the Amish. Little to no carbon footprint. Though humans are a carbon based lifeform... actually everything is.

Are we surprised at Hanoi Jane?

You talking about that MILF that wore spandex in the '80's?

I bet Jane wants to see climate change deniers tortured in prison like she did one of the veterans I personally knew who was tortured after she "visited" him in jail in Vietnam.

Like Democratic DOJ Lynch who : Discussed wheter to pursue legal action against climate change "deniers" cnsnews.com...

Global warming thought police want skeptics in jail. www.investors.com...

Even Newsweek suggested climate change "deniers" should be prosecuted. www.newsweek.com...

I could go on and on.

Gotta love those progressive liberal Democrats: Don't like what people say, throw them in jail!!!
Better yet sic ANTIFA on them to beat the ... out of them.
Ooops, that's illegal? For now, bwahahahaha, just wait till we put one of our own in the White House!

Hanoi Jane, personally responsible for the torturing of my friend, is at it again, except this time she is saying we'll all die in 11 years if we don't do what she tells us to, just can't resist one last push before she croaks.

a reply to: Sheye


Geez , isn't that Commie Washed Up Hollywood Actress Dead Yet ?

a reply to: Sheye

I understand that people get really excited and emotional about the things that they believe and how they feel that it is of upmost importance to convince others- it is a very human reaction when you are convinced of something being the absolute truth. This is even more true when it comes to the very young; that is one of the reasons I can't get on board the "Everybody Hate Greta" train.

My tolerance does not extend to Jane Fonda. Jane has become obsolete in the film industry. After several years of supporting roles without any starring positions she was relegated to a Netflix sitcom which doesn't glean the attention she always craves. Reports surface every few years of her tantrums in regard to not being recognized and given special treatment at restaurants and businesses. I feel she has "hitched her star" to Greta's wagon as a last ditch effort to get back into the public eye- and it is pathetic!

originally posted by: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk
I feel she has "hitched her star" to Greta's wagon as a last ditch effort to get back into the public eye- and it is pathetic!

Since you said it so well, I'll just agree with what you said. Most celebrities, not just Fonda will do anything to get air time.

Fonda is one that needs to retire and disappear into the history books. Enough of her already.

Vietnam was about the same thing. Narcissism and the need to be the center of attention.

originally posted by: Homefree
You talking about that MILF that wore spandex in the '80's?

Yes she worked 9 to 5 to get that.

Edit: but took a shortcut by getting married to Ted Turner.

Nobody is surprised. While Trump isn't (IMO) worth a damn, Jane Fonda has obviously never been a patriot. And neither was Ted Turner (which is what he saw in her, obviously).

We don't live in the sixties and seventies anymore. We can pass information through the internet to help influence people to be more conservative and earth friendly. The people who protested in the sixties, the tree huggers, wound up actually steering people from environmental stewardship ten times more than they got people to be good environmental stewards.

Protests do not work well, especially when people travel from all over the country to protest in big events. If those people were concerned about the environment, they should stay home and use a keyboard to coax others into helping preserve our environment.

I know it is not as fun as traveling half way across the country and getting tossed in jail for inciting civil unrest, but that is real environmental conservation. People who preach environmentalism need to practice what they preach.

I would bet that Jane Fonda had a major negative environmental impact over her lifetime. She is making up for the destruction she caused but will never have as little environmental impact as I have. She may not have cut down any trees, but her lifestyle caused a lot of trees to die I am guessing.

originally posted by: rickymouse
We don't live in the sixties and seventies anymore. We can pass information through the internet to help influence people to be more conservative and earth friendly. The people who protested in the sixties, the tree huggers, wound up actually steering people from environmental stewardship ten times more than they got people to be good environmental stewards.

Protests do not work well, especially when people travel from all over the country to protest in big events. If those people were concerned about the environment, they should stay home and use a keyboard to coax others into helping preserve our environment.

I know it is not as fun as traveling half way across the country and getting tossed in jail for inciting civil unrest, but that is real environmental conservation. People who preach environmentalism need to practice what they preach.

Very well said !! There are much more intelligent and environmentally safe ways to protest in this day and age. It just goes against all common sense to have folks come out in hoards, causing all sorts of traffic chaos.

a reply to: The2Billies

Hey if you don't wanna get tortured don't INVADE another country and slaughter their people. It's pretty simple.

a reply to: Bigburgh

I agree with you. But, you cant take people like bill gates and throw them under the bus for throwing money at climate change awareness.

I am a strong advocate for working with the planet and not working against humans. Meaning, I think humans should have minimal carbon footprint, for a sustainable future, but evolve with earth as it changes and grows.

Lots of people tend to judge on where climate change advocates gain their funding, yet turn a blind eye to where that sort of funding comes from.

But, I am fully aware those people funding climate change might be looking for tax breaks or government to take over their investment venture. Who knows.

Is it really so bad to hope and push for more recycling and renewable energy?

I say Hanoi Jane should go protest China in Hong Kong if she's so stunning and brave.

a reply to: strongfp

Considering a train can move a massive amount of people and cargo with near minimal amount of resources put into it, her using a train isn't really much of a deal. Why do we still use trains if it's your best bang for your buck economically?

granted trains can move more freight than trucks, but it takes 5000 gallons of fuel for a train to go 1100 miles, and that is on level straight tracks with very few stops. add grades up hill and a ton of stops and consumption rates climb, look it up.

Again, people who are most judgmental of her getting funds from philanthropic avenues are usually the ones who advocate for less government, more corporate control, and free market. Which is exactly where most of her money and funding is coming from. But hey, since Soros is an investor, it's DA JOOOOOS! of course. A global conspiracy.

you can bet that the the nazi collaborator george soros doesn't give or spend a dime that he doesn't get back four.

his own words,


and the full interview. listen to all the corrupt governments he's helped and funded. sorry he's no true philanthropist.

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: The2Billies

Hey if you don't wanna get tortured don't INVADE another country and slaughter their people. It's pretty simple.

Don't do things like invade Germany and slaughter Nazi's?

Hate veterans much?

originally posted by: LordAhriman
Is it really so bad to hope and push for more recycling and renewable energy?

Absolutely not ! In fact it’s probably needed and very important to have open dialogue about. It’s how the ‘pushing’ is done that I have an issue with. Let’s encourage intelligent conversation with focus on facts, and not resort to a mob mentality that’s been incited into civil disobedience and rebellion by a few.