House Republicans Storm Secret Impeachment Hearing Today

a reply to: tinner07

Good gawd! I bought something the other day that came to $28.89. Do you actually think next week when my friend asks me how much did you have to pay for that, it's a lie if I say, "30 bucks". Get real.

a reply to: RexKramerPRT

I think there should be. That is a good question.
I found this.

The Committee is "select" in that membership is temporary and rotated among members of the chamber.[2] The committee comprises 15 members. Eight of those seats are reserved for one majority and one minority member of each of the following committees: Appropriations, Armed Services, Foreign Relations, and Judiciary.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

it's bad when President Trump gets 100$ to every dollar the Dems get

a reply to: thedigirati
why is it bad? you have a link to prove that?

Honestly I dont need a link... but it seems everytime a Dem posts or says something on here you all ask for links... I will give you all the same treatment from now on...
you have a link to that statement or just making it up?

You can admit you just assume or what not. But I am tired of you people throwing made up facts out like you know more than you do...

Trump gets 100 to 1 prove it or admit you made it up

a reply to: Gryphon66


Yep. One would think that Nunes would have been standing with this group of interlopers and speaking for them as he is as you say so vocal at other times. Could it be that he has heard things to change his mind about all of this? ......Nah, never mind cuz that ain't gonna happen with him at least.

originally posted by: queenofswords
He is on the Armed Services Committee and said in the video provided in the tweet that the person they had in there was a deputy secy. of defense.

WTF! Are they plotting a military coup? This is pretty scary stuff. Time to have a one-to-one meeting with Schiff for a little water-boarding.

originally posted by: tinner07

They will probably call him a liar about that, too. If Trump says 300mm and it was 298mm, they'll call him a liar for that, too.

a reply to: queenofswords
was it the truth?

do you even care about the truth at this point ?

your Representative is doing everything in secret, do you trust him? i wouldn't

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I think the beef today is that only Dems have been allowed into the scif for the hearings. If my info is wrong about that, please correct me.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

Schiff is doing what anyone doing an investigation would do. You don't consult and share evidence with the person under investigation while doing the investigation..

So according to what you just said, Schiff isn't just investigating the President, but he's investigating the *entire* Republican Party?! Really? So none of them can be party to any of it because he plans to indict and impeach every single last mother-loving one of them?!

How on earth did you get that from what I said?

Lmao

The Dems are acting like 2-year-olds and seriously breaking the law in their zealous attempts to overturn the 2016 election.

Where, in God's name, is there an adult in government?

We are the laughingstock of the planet.

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: thedigirati

President Trump has been saying no president should be treated they way he has been treated.


I do not see many on the left or democrats saying this will be bad for THEIR future.

Because it won't be. Unlike you guys we don't want our crooked politicians to be protected.

Thinking otherwise is nothing but pure projection.

All politicians are crooked. Our last president set the bar to a new high. He got away with just about everything since he was the darling of the media and everyone was afraid to speak up in fear of being called a racist. Now, we have a president the other politicians are afraid of and they're calling him out for a lot less than every politician in my memory got away with.

RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA
UKRAINE UKRAINE UKRAINE
IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH

originally posted by: tinner07

President Trump has been saying no president should be treated they way he has been treated.

a reply to: thedigirati

well gee willakers, why would that be? Day 1 he lied to the American people about the crowd at his inauguration, One of the first things I heard from him was " can I pardon myself"... wont release his taxes, wont recuse himself from his companies, makes money off his office, makes his family top advisors, has his personal atty doing govt work, most of his cabinet picks are not qualified or in prison now, .... mocks Americans....

No president may have been treated like like him because we never elected an ass such as him...

He gets treated that way because he acts that way... He is an ass and should be treated as such

Finally! A Trump hater that made a list of all of Trump's ills. I applaud that, honestly and thank you. There are items on that list that I don't like but I don't find them impeachable or a reason to hate the man. He's a loose cannon when it comes to speaking without a script. I'm in the corporate world and I can tell you every CEO I've ever encountered always said more than he/she should have. They brag and make sh!t smell good and let the rank and file deliver on promises made on the fly.

Trump is far from perfect but, damn, is he worse than a president who was caught on a live mic promising Russia wait until his next term? At least Trump is out front with his ramblings. "Professional" politicians know how to hide all that.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Gryphon66


Yep. One would think that Nunes would have been standing with this group of interlopers and speaking for them as he is as you say so vocal at other times. Could it be that he has heard things to change his mind about all of this? ......Nah, never mind cuz that ain't gonna happen with him at least.

Could be. Something is keeping him quiet. I find it odd because it's so out of character for him.

Hmm.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: seagull

Fox News is told about a dozen Republicans are still in the secure facility known as a SCIF. In another complication, some non-committee members brought in phones and other electronic devices in possible violation of House rules.

If this is true that they were in a SCIF and that some people brought in electronic devices. There's a problem. You cannot bring in electronic devices to the SCIF. The SCIF is a secure room that has sensitive data in it. Though this sounds like they were in there to listen to sensitive testimony. If the people barging did not have clearance they don't belong in there for any reason.

Well, too dam bad. Schifty wants to hide what he is doing from the PUBLIC, ILLEGALLY then lets kick down those doors because nothing he is doing, is allowed by law. PERIOD. I am so waiting for the President to use his authority and sack these jackasses in Congress. Send in the Marines and lets set up a Tribunal for these crooks on charges of TREASON.

They want to play nasty, now they can pay the piper.

a reply to: LogicalGraphitti

Whataboutism - Wiki

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Gryphon66

Let them investigate. The more time they spend on that, the less time they spend on running the country properly, which increases the odds that Democrats will be removed from House Majority next year.

We will see. However, a factor in the election in 2018 of the Democratic majority was impeachment of President Trump. Given the current approval rate of 88% among Democrats for impeachment, I'm not sure you'll get what you want.

Is that the same 88% that, when polled, said they would vote for Hillary in 2016?

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Gryphon66

Let them investigate. The more time they spend on that, the less time they spend on running the country properly, which increases the odds that Democrats will be removed from House Majority next year.

We will see. However, a factor in the election in 2018 of the Democratic majority was impeachment of President Trump. Given the current approval rate of 88% among Democrats for impeachment, I'm not sure you'll get what you want.

Is that the same 88% that, when polled, said they would vote for Hillary in 2016?

Hard to tell. What's 88% of 3 million?

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
The Dems are acting like 2-year-olds and seriously breaking the law in their zealous attempts to overturn the 2016 election.

Where, in God's name, is there an adult in government?

We are the laughingstock of the planet.

They are acting like this because they know they are all under a REAL investigation for SPYING on Trump illegally and then their non stop attempted TREASON based on the same lies. Trump has nothing to worry about. He is still behind the wheel and in time will run these crooks straight into jail. The media is so far off base its not funny.

Ukraine tossed 2 of their Anti-Corruption leaders in jail awhile ago for lying and trying to set up Trump in 2016 lol. Of course you wont hear about that in the TV media.

a reply to: queenofswords

I think the beef today is that only Dems have been allowed into the scif for the hearings. If my info is wrong about that, please correct me.

You are wrong.

Only those who sit on the three committees can attend. The committees include both democrats and republicans. The Republicans who stormed the hearing are NOT part of the three committees, which is why they are not allowed to attend.

only members who sit on the authorized committees are permitted to sit in on the sessions. Scores of Republicans who sit on the three panels leading the inquiry have been participating in the witness interviews.

Link

a reply to: Liquesence

Yes, I read that, and I know that Republicans on those committees have been participating in the closed door hearings and have access to those depositions.

But, I don't think any Republicans have been in attendance within the SCIF hearings.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: queenofswords

I think the beef today is that only Dems have been allowed into the scif for the hearings. If my info is wrong about that, please correct me.

You are wrong.

Only those who sit on the three committees can attend. The committees include both democrats and republicans. The Republicans who stormed the hearing are NOT part of the three committees, which is why they are not allowed to attend.

only members who sit on the authorized committees are permitted to sit in on the sessions. Scores of Republicans who sit on the three panels leading the inquiry have been participating in the witness interviews.

Link

This is correct.

And I love Trump and hate the fact Schiff and Nancy can start an "impeachment inquiry" just the 2 of them without voting. I think if you are "openly" going investigate the president they should have to vote. That is just my opinion.
I also think that this should all be on CSPAN, I wonder what Shiff and Nancy have to hide after the Mueller debacle?

Lolz🤪