It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: Balans
Exactly .. the reasoning of "we need to pull troops out of the ME,", but only these 50 soldiers protecting the kurds. Meanwhile lets send more soldiers to saudi arabia.
Anyone, who isnt a trump zombie, can see this is fishy.
originally posted by: Ohanka
I would've been ashamed to be responsible for teaching terrorists how to massacre Arabs for the crime of simply not being Kurds, personally. I would feel quite relieved not to have that job anymore.
originally posted by: Balans
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
That's hilarious.
So now the common misnomer to pull troops out is only if they're an invasion force. So you are actually against pulling troops out of every other country but Syria at this time.
All of a sudden the ME = only Syria
Something about moving goalposts and stuff.
originally posted by: Balans
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Ofcourse there is a difference.
What is it you are implying with your notification of that difference?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Ohanka
I would've been ashamed to be responsible for teaching terrorists how to massacre Arabs for the crime of simply not being Kurds, personally. I would feel quite relieved not to have that job anymore.
I think it is more that Kurds want their place to call home where they are not persecuted. The British screwed things up.
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Ohanka
I would've been ashamed to be responsible for teaching terrorists how to massacre Arabs for the crime of simply not being Kurds, personally. I would feel quite relieved not to have that job anymore.
I think it is more that Kurds want their place to call home where they are not persecuted. The British screwed things up.
The Zionists said the same thing. It still doesn't justify genocide. Especially when Kurds rights were respected in Ba'athist Syria. This isn't Iraq under Saddam.
Considering the fact that he attacked civilian targets mere hours after Trump's announcement seems to indicate that these soldiers were a detriment.
It also seems like a deal may have been struck between Trump and Erdogan. I mean Trump surprises everyone with this announcement shortly after talking on the phone with Erdogan. These troops just so happen to be the first called home. Turkey then launches its attack. And then Trump excuses it because the Kurds didn't help the allies in WWII. Which is a massive lie by the way.
This all seems very planned out. Erdogan gets his genocide. I wonder what Trump's getting.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: mightmight
Considering the fact that he attacked civilian targets mere hours after Trump's announcement seems to indicate that these soldiers were a detriment.
It also seems like a deal may have been struck between Trump and Erdogan. I mean Trump surprises everyone with this announcement shortly after talking on the phone with Erdogan. These troops just so happen to be the first called home. Turkey then launches its attack. And then Trump excuses it because the Kurds didn't help the allies in WWII. Which is a massive lie by the way.
This all seems very planned out. Erdogan gets his genocide. I wonder what Trump's getting.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Considering the fact that he attacked civilian targets mere hours after Trump's announcement seems to indicate that these soldiers were a detriment.