It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
The Iran's war is profiling... and they will be surely invaded soon. This will not help with Russia and China relationships with USA and EU... This could bring the West to collapse? Maybe!
One thing is sure is that this will not help the West stability...
U.S., Europe Won't Push for Move on Iran
Nov 21, 4:30 PM (ET)
By GEORGE JAHN
VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Washington and its European allies will forgo pushing for Iran's referral to the U.N. Security Council later this week, giving Russia more time in persuading Tehran to give up technology that could make nuclear arms, diplomats and officials told The Associated Press on Monday.
For the Americans and the European Union, the plan holds the promise of success even if Iran continues to reject the proposal that would move its uranium enrichment program to Russia.
The acceptance of that plan, in theory, would deprive the Iranians of the chance to enrich uranium to weapons grade, suitable for use in the core of nuclear warheads.
But if the Russians fail to win over the Iranians, Washington and the Europeans hope Moscow and other key board members of the International Atomic Energy Agency now opposed to Security Council referral will moderate their opposition.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Originally posted by Vitchilo
The Iran's war is profiling... and they will be surely invaded soon. This will not help with Russia and China relationships with USA and EU... This could bring the West to collapse? Maybe!
One thing is sure is that this will not help the West stability...
Iran (the people not the gov) is one of the most pro western countries in the Middle East. Whenever the next revolution takes place, they'll probably get help, but Iran will not be invaded.
And if it was going to be, it would be after we're out of Iraq. Who knows when we'll get out of there.
apnews.myway.com...
U.S., Europe Won't Push for Move on Iran
Nov 21, 4:30 PM (ET)
By GEORGE JAHN
VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Washington and its European allies will forgo pushing for Iran's referral to the U.N. Security Council later this week, giving Russia more time in persuading Tehran to give up technology that could make nuclear arms, diplomats and officials told The Associated Press on Monday.
For the Americans and the European Union, the plan holds the promise of success even if Iran continues to reject the proposal that would move its uranium enrichment program to Russia.
The acceptance of that plan, in theory, would deprive the Iranians of the chance to enrich uranium to weapons grade, suitable for use in the core of nuclear warheads.
But if the Russians fail to win over the Iranians, Washington and the Europeans hope Moscow and other key board members of the International Atomic Energy Agency now opposed to Security Council referral will moderate their opposition.
THE BUSH PROBLEM:
globalresearch.ca...
October 27, 2004 - While the publicly stated reasons will be over Iran's nuclear ambitions, there are unspoken macroeconomic drivers explaining the Real Reasons regarding the 2nd stage of petrodollar warfare - Iran's upcoming euro-based oil Bourse.
In 2005-2006, The Tehran government has a developed a plan to begin competing with New York's NYMEX and London's IPE with respect to international oil trades - using a euro-denominated international oil-trading mechanism. This means that without some form of US intervention, the euro is going to establish a firm foothold in the international oil trade. Given U.S. debt levels and the stated neoconservative project for U.S. global domination, Tehran's objective constitutes an obvious encroachment on U.S. dollar supremacy in the international oil market...
THE BUSH SOLUTION: [without the necessity to reinstitute the draft... thus far...]
www.antiwar.com...
November 12, 2005 - On September 24 of this year, the United States finally achieved a goal it had persistently pursued over several years. Iran was declared by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) to be in "non compliance" with its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
The resolution passed by the IAEA is remarkably weak. It does not set a date for Iran to be referred to the UN Security Council, and it does not even mention the possibility of sanctions. It even notes that Iran has made "good progress" in correcting its "breaches," all of which date back to before October 2003.
There is, however, an even stronger reason for the U.S. to have pushed for this resolution so adamantly, a reason which is valid even if Iran is not referred to the Security Council at the forthcoming November 24 meeting or thereafter, and that supports the predicted scenario.
The IAEA resolution of September 24 2005 allows the United States to carry out a nuclear attack against Iran "legally."
www.antiwar.com...
November 21, 2005 - The Bush administration has put together all the elements it needs to justify the impending military action against Iran. Unlike in the case of Iraq, it will happen without warning, and most of the justifications will be issued after the fact. We will wake up one day to learn that facilities in Iran have been bombed in a joint U.S.-Israeli attack. It may even take another couple of days for the revelation that some of the U.S. bombs were nuclear.
Both Americans and the rest of the world have left the door wide open for this to happen. The international community has failed to declare the Iraq war illegal (e.g., Resolution 1483) under international law, implicitly condoning the next similar U.S. adventure. Furthermore, since the IAEA resolution of Sept. 24, 2005, it is "legal" for the U.S. to use nuclear weapons in a military conflict with Iran.
Originally posted by peterpaul
Hi,
I just stumbled across the John Titor predictions the other day and realized I missed out on that when he apperantly made his visit 5 years ago. After running through most of what he mentioned I realized that some of it might have to do with my own timeline.
I used to work for IBM and that part including his predictions of our future interessted me the most. After running through this string and the many comments and speculations here at ATS I thought it could be useful to exchange some information. It is quite apparent to me that many who have been posting here are speculating on this matter without a solid foundation or knowledge of what might be the true meaning of Titor's visit.
To put things straight beforehand: yes, I am a real living person on this planet and I have been around for some time.
No I am not related to John Titor, but I am aquainted with most matters concerning his appearance and the messages he brought to this world. And I think I have some answers to questions going around that might help some of you to a better understanding when I say that most of what he wrote is true.
Peter Paul
Originally posted by peterpaul
Hi,
I just stumbled across the John Titor predictions the other day and realized I missed out on that when he apperantly made his visit 5 years ago. After running through most of what he mentioned I realized that some of it might have to do with my own timeline.
I used to work for IBM and that part including his predictions of our future interessted me the most. After running through this string and the many comments and speculations here at ATS I thought it could be useful to exchange some information. It is quite apparent to me that many who have been posting here are speculating on this matter without a solid foundation or knowledge of what might be the true meaning of Titor's visit.
To put things straight beforehand: yes, I am a real living person on this planet and I have been around for some time.
No I am not related to John Titor, but I am aquainted with most matters concerning his appearance and the messages he brought to this world. And I think I have some answers to questions going around that might help some of you to a better understanding when I say that most of what he wrote is true.
Peter Paul
Originally posted by peterpaul
Hi,
I just stumbled across the John Titor predictions the other day and realized I missed out on that when he apperantly made his visit 5 years ago. After running through most of what he mentioned I realized that some of it might have to do with my own timeline.
I used to work for IBM and that part including his predictions of our future interessted me the most. After running through this string and the many comments and speculations here at ATS I thought it could be useful to exchange some information. It is quite apparent to me that many who have been posting here are speculating on this matter without a solid foundation or knowledge of what might be the true meaning of Titor's visit.
To put things straight beforehand: yes, I am a real living person on this planet and I have been around for some time.
No I am not related to John Titor, but I am aquainted with most matters concerning his appearance and the messages he brought to this world. And I think I have some answers to questions going around that might help some of you to a better understanding when I say that most of what he wrote is true.
Peter Paul
Originally posted by grimreaper797
spawnnn your going to have to have some backround in physics to understand it at all. even then it can be hard to. i cant really direct you to anything specific but but basically time travel in theory doesnt make much sense, in the realm of physics it makes alittle more sense.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
Originally posted by grimreaper797
spawnnn your going to have to have some backround in physics to understand it at all. even then it can be hard to. i cant really direct you to anything specific but but basically time travel in theory doesnt make much sense, in the realm of physics it makes alittle more sense.
well, that certainly cleared things up for me. not quite a gazrok or byrd post, but very informative in its own way
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
can you help me out. there seems to be a wee little contradiction in your post....
"I just stumbled across the John Titor predictions the other day"
"No I am not related to John Titor, but I am aquainted with most matters concerning his appearance and the messages he brought to this world. "
please elaborate a little more. how can you be aquainted with something you just stumbled on the other day ?
txs
Originally posted by grimreaper797
im guessing youve heard of stromberger then paul? could you translate any of his writtings since you speak german, ive been trying to get some translations of whats left of his writtings. the nazis destroyed alot of his writtings because of his predictions about the rise and fall of hitler, any info i could get
you can reach me via AIM at GrimReaper797 or PM