It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
And with the riots in France... and the riots in Argentina against Bush's administration... I don't know why people in the USA are not doing like those in Argentina against this criminal...
[edit on 5-11-2005 by Vitchilo]
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
where to hide...
how do explain the 2 billion metric tons he would need to carry in his suitcase ? if you've read every page of this thread, you know what I'm talking about.....
You have voted Where2Hide2006 for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
where to hide...
...how do explain the 2 billion metric tons he would need to carry in his suitcase ? if you've read every page of this thread, you know what I'm talking about.....
Originally posted by Frosty
There is a month and a half left in 2005 and yet no civil war. Why is this thread still going on?
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
JT stated the war starts in 2005. he even defined war as organized troops engaged in combat (or something close to that)
can you demonstrate any of these events ? pictures ? audio ?
I thought is was 2008 it was at everyones doorstep.....not the year it begins
Originally posted by Yarcofin
For that exact reason.... Don't count it out before it's time. I can't count how many times I've been playing poker and won it on the very last card. It only takes a moment for the entire world to take a giant 360. January 1st 2006 at midnight we can all stop (except the people who are going with the Olympics thing) and admit it was wrong. Not a moment sooner.
The civil war in the United States will start in 2004.
It's 2004. I apologize for a missed key (very observant - we all need good critics).
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
[This thread should have stopped at January 1st 2005
How many times has it been stated in this thread, that Titor corrected himself and said that the war would start in 2004?
John Titor:
The civil war in the United States will start in 2004.
After he said 2005 in one of his posts someone commented on it and then
John Titor again:
It's 2004. I apologize for a missed key (very observant - we all need good critics).
I'm not getting what's so confusing about what he wrote. 2004 is 2004 not 2005.
In that same paragraph he goes on to describe how he views war.
"I would define it as a conflict where organized groups engage in maneuver and armed conflict."
Now if that didn't start in 2004, then he wouldn't have said the war started in 2004.
Originally posted by Long Lance
the first death by non-lethal weapon happened late 2004, i know you'd rather pry your tongue out instead of admitting that such kind of homicide is a crime, not an accident and might as well be considered precursory violence.
yes, he said 2004, and IF you used the awkard phrase 'unprovoked violent death' instead of your narrow, politically abused term 'war', you'd see why many people make such an issue out of this..