It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.snopes.com...
The electorate in 2004 was not nearly so sharply divided along regional lines, however — an electoral map just makes it appear that way because of the "winner take all" nature of the U.S. electoral system.
An election map with finer gradation (i.e., displaying results on a county-by-county basis rather than a state-by-state one, and providing color shading to reflect the closeness of the vote in each area) produces a better picture of how strongly both candidates in the 2004 election ran even in states which they lost:
What we saw in the 2004 election was more of an urban vs. rural division, regardless of state.
the sharpest geographic distinction between the two candidates did not primarily correspond to region but to size of community: Senator John Kerry had a substantial 60%-39% edge in large cities (representing roughly 13% of the total U.S. population), while the reverse was true in rural areas (representing roughly 16% of the total U.S. population), where President Bush garnered a 59%-40% majority.
You've been to Cedar Key? You must be aware I don't know any personal information about you. If I was going to guess, I would say it's important to avoid the rattlesnake or you might be "walking" back to shore. You may be happy to know that although the bridge is gone, Cedar Key is still there."
The vast majority of people who feel like their rights are being taken away by the government in exchange for security are living in the cities.
This is what bothers me about what Titor said. He makes the supposition that the people in the country, who voted Republican, are the ones that would be upset with the administrations policies.
Originally posted by modese7enDoes anyone else have any ideas as to where Titor lived? According to his story, I've narrowed it down to the area Southwest of Gainesville. Its my best guess. I have family in the area, I'd love to take a film crew down and document the search for Titor
Originally posted by modese7enThis is a polar opposite to the situation that Titor claimed to have happened in his world line. Primarily rural areas are bastions of support for the current administration; he claimed that the people in the cities would be the supporters of the regime responsible for the rise of, as he called it, the Federal Empire.
Originally posted by ShadowEyes
You may be seeing the country people in your area cheering for this administration but I am seeing something much different in my area.
Xphiles If your talking about this worldline, then your way off on where he lives ... Titor did not meet himself in his worldline, but he did in ours, so his family probably moved him away because of his own warnings... I think it is rumored they did that, but I'm not sure.
I do not think it is polar opposite. I wouldn't believe any polls that show other wise due to current propaganda.... If you take for example LockHeed employee's, they strongly support the current administration and the majority of them live in the city. There is more corporations in the city like LockHeed right? Gas prices is going to keep these people closer to their "Federal Empire."
Originally posted by jumpspace
modese7en:
You logic regarding city/rural polarization is correct if Titor was talking about this.
He didn't state what he was talking about though.
He could have also been talking about a Federal/State Government clash or anhything else for that matter.
Cheers
JS
Originally posted by modese7en
I don't quite follow. I know I saw something about how Titor's alleged parents moved away from Fl during the hurricanes, but he definately said that he lived in FL, on a river with access to the gulf, and seemed very familiar with UF, Cedar Key, and Jax. That would make his home between Gainesville, Ocala, and the Suwannee. In any case, Titor said that he would be in the "fightin' diamondbacks" when he is 13, so he should be back in FL in a few years.
But, time is so short
Originally posted by modese7en
Originally posted by jumpspace
modese7en:
You logic regarding city/rural polarization is correct if Titor was talking about this.
He didn't state what he was talking about though.
He could have also been talking about a Federal/State Government clash or anhything else for that matter.
Cheers
JS
Wouldn't be a state gov vs. federal gov thing. Titor said he spent time fighting federal and national guard troops, so the federal and state gov'ts were working together against the "rebels."
I can definately buy this belief. But again, I ask you to take a look at the maps for both the 2000 and 2004 elections. Votes for the opposition to the Bush admin came, primarily, from urban areas like New York, San Fran, LA, Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis, etc. These are the places that have the highest concentration of people who do not support the admin that Titor claims leads us to the civil war. Things could change, I suppose, and there could be a population trade. More libs moving out of the cities away from police/military, more cons moving to the cities for jobs. But, time is so short
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Also, it would be logical that people in cities vote for Bush because they are mostly manipulated by CNN/FOX terrorist propaganda fear. And the boogeyman is much likely to hit cities, not rural areas, so people are more concerned by those facts.
Titor even stated it won't be dem vs. repub.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
So we can ask ourselves if the numbers are the good ones for either side.
You're conclusion Grimpreaper is very probable, because both sides are bilderberger /skulls and bones/NWO/sold to corporations, so people will really know that republican/democrats are the same crappy thing.
[edit on 22-7-2006 by Vitchilo]