IRS Whistleblower

I've looked. And I can find no information besides - someone was meddling with something with regard to the President or the VP.

What do you think was the meddling', the intent of the meddling and who initiated the meddling (the person who meddled or outside interests coercing the meedler - bribe, threat, etc).

What do you think....

On The Money: IRS whistleblower said Treasury official might have tried to interfere with Trump audit

The background:

The Democratic-led House Ways and Means Committee mentioned in an August court filing that it had received credible allegations from a federal employee.

The employee reported potentially inappropriate attempts to influence the IRS's mandatory audit program for presidential and vice presidential tax returns.

The court filings are part of the Ways and Means Committee's lawsuit to obtain six years of Trump's tax returns, which the panel says is relevant to potential legislation relevant to how the IRS audits presidents.

thehill.com...

That's all we know ...

originally posted by: FyreByrd

On The Money: IRS whistleblower said Treasury official might have tried to interfere with Trump audit

Key phrase might have!

Got to have the next scandal on deck...just in case the current one fails.

On The Money: IRS whistleblower said Treasury official might have tried to interfere with Trump audit

The background:

The Democratic-led House Ways and Means Committee mentioned in an August court filing that it had received credible allegations from a federal employee.

The employee reported potentially inappropriate attempts to influence the IRS's mandatory audit program for presidential and vice presidential tax returns.

The court filings are part of the Ways and Means Committee's lawsuit to obtain six years of Trump's tax returns, which the panel says is relevant to potential legislation relevant to how the IRS audits presidents.

Not much "there" there... lots of loose words in that story (see bold above). There are less loose hookers roaming the streets of New York.

a reply to: FyreByrd

All this "alleged" crap is getting old.

Remember when the media would break real news and not speculation?

Whats up with these "whistleblowers" that don't actually know the truth?

IRS whistleblower said Treasury official might have tried to interfere with Trump audit

The employee reported potentially inappropriate attempts to influence the IRS's mandatory audit program for presidential and vice presidential tax returns.

Quoted from the OP's source.

originally posted by: smkymcnugget420

Key phrase might have!

a reply to: theatreboy

so you admit it!! IMPEACH!!!!!! reeeeeeeee

Actually, It pi$$es me off....

I am tired off people throwing anything at the to try and get it to stick to the wall. They have been trying since the day he got elected.

While the whistleblower refused to discuss the specifics of the complaint, "I have some legitimate concerns about reckless statements being made about whistleblowers," he told the paper

Those types of comments "attack the messenger when the focus should be on the facts that were presented," the whistleblower added. "I am concerned also by the relative silence of people who should be repudiating these dangerous attacks in the strongest terms."

Source

The whistleblower is already sounding like a partisan hack in my opinion. Like someone else already stated.

Got to have the next scandal on deck...just in case the current one fails.

Posted by ATruGod

a reply to: FyreByrd

More Democrat BS !!!!!

If anyone was abusing the IRS for political purposes, OBAMA was it.
Justice and the IRS have admitted guilt and had to compensate conservative groups persecuted by Obama via the IRS

Libtards always projecting their scumbag behavior on others.

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: FyreByrd

All this "alleged" crap is getting old.

Remember when the media would break real news and not speculation?

Never used the word alleged. Only stated the Verifiable Facts from a middle of the road source.

I, for one would like to know more on this and the Ukrainian issue as well. Whistleblowers are a necessary part of holding government accountable and Congress is the oversight body for the Federal government.

These complaints deserve an honest hearting.

originally posted by: FyreByrd

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: FyreByrd

All this "alleged" crap is getting old.

Remember when the media would break real news and not speculation?

Never used the word alleged. Only stated the Verifiable Facts from a middle of the road source.

I, for one would like to know more on this and the Ukrainian issue as well. Whistleblowers are a necessary part of holding government accountable and Congress is the oversight body for the Federal government.

These complaints deserve an honest hearting.

When definititive statements are made from first hand witnesses of illegal behavior, then yes, I agree. They need to be heard and using the WB protections is imposrtant to allow that to come to light.

However, that is not what we have been seeing, have we?

It's all alleged's and 2nd and 3rd hand information. Anyone that played the game "telephone" as a kid will know the story changes with each telling.

a reply to: FyreByrd

Funny how whistleblowers deserve to be heard, but when a Democrat (Obama) held office they prosecuted whistleblowers with the espionage act, which included journalists. Just another example of the extreme hypocrisy of the left.

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: FyreByrd

Funny how whistleblowers deserve to be heard, but when a Democrat (Obama) held office they prosecuted whistleblowers with the espionage act, which included journalists. Just another example of the extreme hypocrisy of the left.

Now it would be considered obstruction of justice (until a, heaven forbid, democrat gets into office).

originally posted by: FyreByrd

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: FyreByrd

All this "alleged" crap is getting old.

Remember when the media would break real news and not speculation?

Never used the word alleged. Only stated the Verifiable Facts from a middle of the road source.

I, for one would like to know more on this and the Ukrainian issue as well. Whistleblowers are a necessary part of holding government accountable and Congress is the oversight body for the Federal government.

These complaints deserve an honest hearting.

I didn't mean you specifically.
But the clips you posted have the words "might" and "potential" in them.

They never use the word proof in their stories...
That gets old especially after crying wolf so many times in the past..

Is this "whistler" getting paid out of the same fund
as the other "whistler"?

Like the accusers of Kavanaugh that were lying,
it is hard to trust anonymous sources that are being paid!

originally posted by: burntheships
Is this "whistler" getting paid out of the same fund
as the other "whistler"?

Like the accusers of Kavanaugh that were lying,
it is hard to trust anonymous sources that are being paid!

I predict a GoFundMe in this WB's future. It's a new $$ making scheme, and the MSM is falling for it every day because it supports their TDS.

a reply to: Krakatoa

Of course! GoFundMe and free Soros money.

It's a racket. Someone needs to investigate the
money fund that is being paid to these "whistlers".
Money should count towards political donations
or campaign finance violations even.

Kinda funny to see trumps deranged supporters shout corruption by Biden on one thread then, on an actual corruption case declare corruption should not be looked into.
Tax avoidance is corruption folks, trumps deranged supporters sure have a wonky outlook on reality.

a reply to: contextual

Attacking the posters is a weak-minded strategy. You could always prove us dummies wrong, but that would require work so I get it.