NY Times claims 'airplanes took aim' at WTC on 9/11, not terrorists

a reply to: Metallicus

There was no 9/11, the TV said so.

I'm bewildered how all these tv stations erase previous scenes in shows that features images of the twin towers before the attack occured!

It's painfully obvious the MSM handled the event poorly. Whether it being trying to erase memories or coming up with wild conspiracies, all I know is when I woke up and saw the news, I saw a deliberate act of terrorism, I didn't know their motive and I still don't.

But thanks to the MSM and other garbage, we now know it was those pesky saudijewisrealighanistnians, because saying terrorists is a mouthful.

I still like the timed detonation idea, I could go into the science, but if you throw a marble at a game of Jenga, would it collapse straight down?

we talking about the same company that just gave up how many jobs?

2nd

same company laying 10k plus jobs?

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: Metallicus

I still like the timed detonation idea, I could go into the science, but if you throw a marble at a game of Jenga, would it collapse straight down?

Is your "marble at a game of Jenga" comment serious or an attempt at humor?

Maybe the best example of fake outrage to date.

Hey, let's just assign intent to every piece of written word and make nothing into something I can be outraged about!

AS if typing that the planes took aim was an intentional attempt to avoid blaming terrorists, and for absolutely no reason. The level of ridiculousness it must take to make that assumption just for a daily dose of outrage and blame is sort of pathetic.

Hey let me check into the local stories and make sure there wasn't a train that derailed or anything because that's obviously an attempt by the "fake news liberal media agenda" to avoid blaming the conductor of the train......

Oh dear, I see a story today about how vaping is causing serious disease and death instead of assigning blame to the user of the vape pen. Ooh, and there was a local four car pile up on the highway. I can't believe those socialist loving reporters didn't phrase it as "four human drivers collided their vehicles together" like it should have been stated so i can avoid my fake outrage at nothing!

Stupidity at it's finest.

originally posted by: usernameconspiracy
Maybe the best example of fake outrage to date.

Hey, let's just assign intent to every piece of written word and make nothing into something I can be outraged about!

AS if typing that the planes took aim was an intentional attempt to avoid blaming terrorists, and for absolutely no reason. The level of ridiculousness it must take to make that assumption just for a daily dose of outrage and blame is sort of pathetic.

Hey let me check into the local stories and make sure there wasn't a train that derailed or anything because that's obviously an attempt by the "fake news liberal media agenda" to avoid blaming the conductor of the train......

Oh dear, I see a story today about how vaping is causing serious disease and death instead of assigning blame to the user of the vape pen. Ooh, and there was a local four car pile up on the highway. I can't believe those socialist loving reporters didn't phrase it as "four human drivers collided their vehicles together" like it should have been stated so i can avoid my fake outrage at nothing!

Stupidity at it's finest.

Sounds pretty correct, these gulls take a badly worded piece of news and run with it as something that somehow the NYT is, 'anti-American' As for event itself, it is chock full of anomalies, start to finish, that may never be resolved.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Wardaddy454

How does it diminish anything? Just because you say so doesn't make it true. Everyone already knows terrorists committed the attacks even people who weren't alive when it happened.

Don't clutch your pearls too tightly. I know you guys love being outraged at every turn but this is petty as hell and you know it. Lol.

Then why is is so hard for them to print that in the headline?

Do you remember before 'fake news' was a thing? Everyone knew FOX was a right wing bullhorn, and the Enquirer was entertainment. Heck, nobody took/takes the magazines seriously that you find in the checkout line at the grocery store. But now that Trump calls anything he doesn't like 'fake news' his supporters are now somehow experts at policing fair journalism, it just happens that the only clue they need is that it somehow doesn't fit their political world view.

I will never not be amazed at how Trump supporters can reconcile their conservative values with a POTUS that's on record saying things like 'grabbing them by the p*ssy', or *agreeing with* and letting Howard Stern call his own daughter a 'hot piece of a**' ON THE RADIO, and actually follow his lead when it comes to parsing the news they read.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Wrong. We've always had squadrons on five and fifteen minutes alerts. That's what pilots duty days are.

Jaden

a reply to: Masterjaden

Where and what sq, 18 good years of USAF service I have only seen alert for exercise s and right after 9-11.

So I am curious...

And on the 30th anniversary they will make remarks like the u.s. may have had it coming.

These liberal outlets may have been infiltrated by the enemy.
Radical foreigners who want to attack and damage the country from the inside, out.

Many elected officials , many media outlets ,and silicon valley have become the bitches of these groups.

Nothing can be done or said without conferring with BLM, LGBTQ, and muslims.

a reply to: CajunMetal

Agreed completely!

I sure miss the days when we did things on this site like discuss if 9/11 was a conspiracy and an inside job.

JD

well, the fact is those terrorists failed basic flight, but hey, they could do a top gun maneuvers with the big civilian planes...

the men couldn’t grasp simple radio communications, nor did they possess the mechanical aptitude for basic flight operations — straight-and-level flight, left and right turns.

Link

yeah, right

It's simple and not simple at the same time. It definately was a terrorist attack. The only question is which terrorist was running the show. No use debating this unless you can post hard evidence with links. Otherwise it it is just a children's squabble. Personally I lean toward it being an inside job, but I don't know for sure. So, i'm not going to argue with an iron fist. Get over your ego people.

Little snippets like this stay in people's minds. Especially the easily swayed. Release stories like this every so often while at the same time burying what most likely happened.
Eventually the lies become the truth. We all saw various different angles of the planes hitting the towers on the news that day that have all but vanished into thin air.
The current generation believe anything the MSM tells them. As long as it's on Facebook or Twiter, it's true. The books 1984 and A Brave New World come to mind.

Here the most likely scenario of what may have happened that day...

originally posted by: openedeyesandears
Here the most likely scenario of what may have happened that day...

Is that the same David Icke that believes we are living in our own version of V with lizard people?

a reply to: ReligionSucks

Yes it was most certainly a terrorist attack.

The only intelligent question is just who the terrorists were.

It is highly likely that the terrorists were NOT who the official myth says. All things considered, it was an inside job.

a reply to: Metallicus

Maybe it was just a case of some airplanes doing something...gawd....

Saying that airplanes attacked on 911 is a subtle way of pushing the Global warming hoax agenda. The MSM are trying to get the masses to dislike airplanes. so, it will make it easier to ban them.