Not everybody has to have a soul

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Actually, in a solipsistic viewpoint, there are no other "observers" that exist outside of and independenly of my own. So, if anyone else has a soul, its just about being part of the shared mind of source. They just exist at a different point in time of the timeline within source.

a reply to: SourceTruth
Whatever you say.

Lying about your own age to target teen boys.
You should be ashamed of yourself.

My name is Steve and I'm gonna leave.
Im sure if others could say the same the world would be a better place.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

More straw-manning accusations.

It is quite interesting that you mentioned the name "Steve", I am quite familiar with that name.

a reply to: SourceTruth
Will you leave too?

son, Wil you please leave?

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

What kind of response do you expect?

a reply to: SourceTruth
You've been caught out on other forums and I gave you the benefit of the doubt earlier but there is no point discussing anything with you.

You are a liar and a fool.

I'm not trying to insult you.
Just making sure you are aware that I know you are a liar and a fool.

I'm no smarter, I believed you were a stupid kid for so long. But since you're a conman and not a conned boy there's probably not much value in discussing this further.

But stunts like this could be exactly what is needed to shut Carmen sandiego down. Once Patreon and YouTube realises you are targeting minors on other sites it changes the situation drastically.

One last question to dodge....

What do you think the penalty for grooming children online should be?

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

No, what actually happened was that I was persecuted for my beliefs on other websites. They were bigoted torwards me for my beliefs. That is what led to me getting banned from various other forums.
In addition, the level of intellectual discussion that I was talking on was a few steps much higher then they could handle. It makes them feel like they are being talked down to.

You have no evidence for any of your accusations. It is just one of your tactics to persecute me for my religious beliefs.

By the way, I noticed this was the 666th post on this thread... This is a critical moment in the thread when these repdigit numbers manifest.


I also noticed that this is your 2591st post. This is another significant number.
2591 is the 377th prime, and 377 is thr 14th Fibonacci number. The number 14 shows up in many more places, but too much to explain in just this one post. But, I understand the significance of this number.
And 377 is a Pi reference... 3 and (7+7=14) is 3 and 14, just like 3.14 equals Pi.

This is more evidence of number synchronicity playing out in the matrix.


This goes to show you how the matrix creates all of these events within the matrix.

I found even more synchronicity in the gematria of your username, Krahzeef_Ukhar.

"Krahzeef_Ukhar" = 139 (English Ordinal), 67 (Full Reduction)

139 is the 34th prime
67 is the 8th superprime

We have these two numbers 34 and 8.
This post is on the 34th page of this thread and is the 8th post in the page.

So, this clearly shows a gematria connection with your name and the event of the discovery of the connection of your name. I am quite impressed! The matrix synchronicity is everywhere, just hiding in plain sight, waiting to be decoded by me.

originally posted by: SourceTruth
In addition, the level of intellectual discussion that I was talking on was a few steps much higher then they could handle. It makes them feel like they are being talked down to.

You have no evidence for any of your accusations. It is just one of your tactics to persecute me for my religious beliefs.

Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha you're a fool.

I'm sure that everyone that disagrees with you just can't understand your greatness.

Hahahahahahahahahahauauauahahahajahahahahahahahahahahahauahahauauauauauauuuuhhhahahahahahahauquauauauhhhahahahahua.

What do you think the penalty for grooming children online should be?

originally posted by: SourceTruth
You have no evidence for any of your accusations. It is just one of your tactics to persecute me for my religious beliefs.

I accused you of being a fool.
Show me where I'm wrong.

But you are motivated. You wanna take over Judy's scam by the sounds of things.

Godspeed young conman.

originally posted by: SourceTruth
I am quite impressed! The matrix synchronicity is everywhere, just hiding in plain sight, waiting to be decoded by me.

Exactly right.
You are amazing.

Good for you.
You're special.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Now that's just an ad-hominem. Calling me a fool is an ad-hominem tactic.
And so is calling me a "conman".

You have no justification for calling Judy's matrrial a "scam".

originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Now that's just an ad-hominem. Calling me a fool is an ad-hominem tactic.
And so is calling me a "conman".

You have no justification for calling Judy's matrrial a "scam".

No that's incorrect.
You don't understand concepts like Solipsism or even strawman arguments.

You are a fool.

originally posted by: SourceTruth
You have no justification for calling Judy's matrrial a "scam".

Hahahaajajajajahajhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahauahahahaauuahahhauahahahahhahayayayahayhahahahaha.

Did you realise how funny that was before you posted it?

originally posted by: SourceTruth
And so is calling me a "conman".

You have no justification for calling Judy's matrrial a "scam".

I've been calling you a conwoman for months.

I thought you would appreciate that I did my research and got it correct calling you a conman.

What do you think the penalty for grooming children online should be?

What makes the question so juicy is that it's plausible you could be asked that in court.

And rightfully so because you are a monster preying on children.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

This is now just you persecuting me for my religious beliefs.

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar

originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Now that's just an ad-hominem. Calling me a fool is an ad-hominem tactic.
And so is calling me a "conman".

You have no justification for calling Judy's matrrial a "scam".

No that's incorrect.
You don't understand concepts like Solipsism or even strawman arguments.

You are a fool.

Wrong. You don't understand my understanding of them.
You also don't understand that ad-hominems are not an appropriate way to converse with others. Have some respect, mind you?

a reply to: SourceTruth
I guess we are adding ad-hominem to the list of words you don't understand.

It is really hard to respect you.
Not just because you are a liar.
And not just because you are a fool.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

By saying that you don't respect me, you are actually saying that you don't respect me because I have different beliefs then you do. That is not the kind of intolerant mindset that you would expect from someone who claims to understand things better then me, you would think that they would have some sort of empathy towards others based in an understanding of all points of views. It reflects more on the mindset of someone who is arrogant and full of themselves and puts their viewpoints above the viewpoints of others.