UK crowns rear of the year why US and UK are so different

a reply to: JAGStorm

No we simply just need to buy a ticket to the UK.

How will you Americans fit on a plane to the UK? have to reserve the seats adjacent to ya

I'm curious ......when they are not flaunting barely covered bottoms, where

on earth do they get clothes/trousers/jeans to fit those ginormous buttocks

They surely can't be stitched, they must have to be molded. /smh

a reply to: eletheia

They surely can't be stitched, they must have to be molded.

I think some of them are spray on.

a reply to: JAGStorm

Why are the UK and US so different?

Simple really. The US got Kim Kardashian, the "bum" of the Universe! No contest there. So.........the UK had to go the other way.......the "bum" of the year is the smallest possible "bum"!

Makes perfect sense when you think about it!

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: JAGStorm

Why are the UK and US so different?

Simple really. The US got Kim Kardashian, the "bum" of the Universe! No contest there. So.........the UK had to go the other way.......the "bum" of the year is the smallest possible "bum"!

Makes perfect sense when you think about it!

That's pretty funny.

The other thing that is interesting is that people went right for the Kardashians as an example. Sure Amanda has a small butt and Kardashaians have a big butt, but is there no middle ground??? I guess like you said, it is simple, always the extremes right?

originally posted by: JAGStorm

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: JAGStorm

Why are the UK and US so different?

Simple really. The US got Kim Kardashian, the "bum" of the Universe! No contest there. So.........the UK had to go the other way.......the "bum" of the year is the smallest possible "bum"!

Makes perfect sense when you think about it!

That's pretty funny.

The other thing that is interesting is that people went right for the Kardashians as an example. Sure Amanda has a small butt and Kardashaians have a big butt, but is there no middle ground??? I guess like you said, it is simple, always the extremes right?

It’s not the size that matters but the quality...

“Drops mic and backs out of room”

originally posted by: Lagomorphe

It’s not the size that matters but the quality...

“Drops mic and backs out of room”

Just had a thought When sitting on public transport does the *mass* of behind

push the owner forward? OR does it spread out to the sides and push any other on

the shared seat off

a reply to: operation mindcrime

Yeah 2nd one hands down; the 1st should be covered in public, that much cellulite should be extirpated!

The young lady is definitely missing the padding needed to be a rear of the year candidate. I think you are spot on Jag.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

But are we sure that was a woman? Its hard to tell sometimes-these days you see lots of guys

Try again full screen - "Deny Ignorance"

well may I suggest....a visit to the optometrist

originally posted by: Metallicus
The young lady is definitely missing the padding needed to be a rear of the year candidate. I think you are spot on Jag.

Well in all fairness it's the British winner. Like Jag said:

Maybe our standards in the US are impossibly large?



Peace

a reply to: eletheia

I could tell you of when we had a stopover in Atlanta USA a few years ago and this "thing" gets on and her rolls of blubber spread over her seat and onto my space.....economy class USA ....they helped her on the plane by wheelchair she was that that big.

Then she started to tell me her life story!

(My wife couldn't stop laughing at my "luck")
Arrggggghhhhhh

a reply to: JAGStorm

I'll defer to Sir Mix-a-lot (he must be knighted)
you can do sidebends or sit-ups but baby don't lose that butt!

a reply to: eletheia

Not to mention there is no possible way these women can lie on their backs without some kind of bracing.

Not that there's anything wrong with that but the human female that has proportions that are more normal.

originally posted by: JAGStorm

The other thing that is interesting is that people went right for the Kardashians as an example. Sure Amanda has a small butt and Kardashaians have a big butt, but is there no middle ground??? I guess like you said, it is simple, always the extremes right?

Kardashians? Bah!



God Bless America!

a reply to: VictorVonDoom

That brought a tear to my eye!

God Bless America!

Yes, vote one for Amanda Hold-ons bum....and slim petite females.

Hate the Kartrashian big "butt".

Butt isn't the big bum an African thing?....as in Afro American obsession?

I guess someone has got to love fat ugly white women.....

But I must make an apology to USAnian peoples.

We are given the impression that you are full of guns and violence, with black fella gangs everywhere, freaking out whiteys, that everyone over there is UUGGGEEE, and full on slobs etc etc .....

BUT!!! I recently watched some "Ambience" videos, of someone walking around New York at night, and Chicago during the day for serveral hours.........

WELLL, I was actually Mighty impressed and amazed to say that the person filming was not attacked once!!, that there really was no black gangs observed, that in fact there weren't many blacks on the streets at all really (more Hispanics), And that of all the 100s of locals shown 99% were NOT fat, and barely overweight, in fact most (Women) were quite attractive (even the black ones), and slim/fit looking.

Perhaps you all should work harder at changing the perception the rest of the World has of you guys....you actually all looked .....Normal. .

Maybe I will visit the US after all.....

Well done USA.

Take it away, Mickey Rourke.