It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A murder trial in this suburban New Orleans town took a strange twist last week when a California psychic testified that she helped crack a Louisiana homicide case last June from her home 2,000 miles away.
The trial ended Friday when the defendant, Michael Phillips, 22, of Kenner, pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and was sentenced to life in prison. But the highlight of testimony came Thursday, when Rosemarie Kerr took the stand to tell how she helped solve the murder of Andre Daigle of River Ridge.
That's not true and if you did any research at all on this topic you would know it.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Pseudoskeptics act like if psychics aren't 100% accurate then they're all 100% false.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
That's not true and if you did any research at all on this topic you would know it.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Pseudoskeptics act like if psychics aren't 100% accurate then they're all 100% false.
The problems are well known such as lack of repeatability, statistical significance problems, file drawer problems, etc.
In one study Dean Radin said if there was no psychic ability, selecting the one choice out of four that matched by random chance was 25%, but the "psychic" got 34% correct. He says the 9% doesn't sound like much. He's right, it doesn't sound like much. Despite people wanting to believe you could never get 34% correct by random chance when the expected value is 25%, it can happen, especially if there are file drawer problems or other forms of bias. The psychic doesn't have to be 100% accurate, but getting at least half right would be a lot more convincing than only 34%, which is really not very good at all, that means about 2/3 were wrong.
If the psychic got 2/3 right or 67%, that's nowhere near 100% accurate but if that could be repeated that would be enough to convince many skeptics. But getting 2/3 wrong is not enough to convince them, and it's really not a very good result despite Dean Radin claiming otherwise.
originally posted by: kwakakev
The TV Series "The Medium" has been a good one with a lot of stories about the psychic boundaries with the law. As with all investigations everything gets questioned, introducing sources from an unknown origin can have its problems. In the hunt for a killer it is a good one for the tool box, can't argue with results.
Good to see the courts taking these issues on.