It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Maverick7
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: Maverick7
We all know who killed her. She argued with him that night. What's puzzling is that Christopher Walken won't discuss it.
Same thing with a certain Star Trek actor - we all know he did a terrible deed. Some people are beyond the law.
We know no such things. Some of us believe in any rumor that floats around. Innocent until proven guilty? Not around here. It's Trial by Internet or Trial by Newspaper.
Why would Walken refuse to discuss it if she had gotten in a boat drunk? He knows what happened. He said there was yelling. Wood was deathly afraid of deep water.
So I'll amend that - if you're not brain dead, you can draw your own conclusions.
originally posted by: schuyler
You know nothing. You read an article and came to a conclusion. Now you're claiming you're smarter than others because of that article. Were you there? No. Do you know any more than you read in an article? No. Do you know anything more about the case than you heard or read in the MSM? No. But you're willing to condemn someone because you read an article. Fortunately we do not convict people just because a stranger read an article and came to a conclusion.
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: schuyler
You know nothing. You read an article and came to a conclusion. Now you're claiming you're smarter than others because of that article. Were you there? No. Do you know any more than you read in an article? No. Do you know anything more about the case than you heard or read in the MSM? No. But you're willing to condemn someone because you read an article. Fortunately we do not convict people just because a stranger read an article and came to a conclusion.
That article plus many others around of similar vein have never been challenged.
If there is no truth in them the people responsible for them are in a position of
being charged for deformation and libel, and having heavy compensation claims
made against them.........
Makes one wonder why those options haven't been taken up?
originally posted by: schuyler
Makes one wonder why NOBODY HAS BEEN CHARGED.
Yacht captain Dennis Davern says he lied and blames about Natalie Wood's mysterious
death and blames her husband Robert Wagner for her drowning.
Mr Davern told NBC TV's today show that he made mistakes by not telling the truth about
events leading to the death, and urged Los Angeles County sheriff's homicide investigators
to reopen the case.
The programme host went on to ask Davern "Was the fight between Natalie and her
husband what ultimately led to her death?" Yes replied Mr Davern.
Davern went on to say he believed Wagner had intentionally kept the investigation into
his wife's death 'low profile' and didn't do everything he could have done to save her.
Wagner said in 2008 that Natalie went into the master cabin during an argument
between himself and Walken .......and the last time he saw his wife she was fixing
her hair at the bathroom mirror.
originally posted by: schuyler
Makes one wonder why NOBODY HAS BEEN CHARGED. All this innuendo is completely unproven Internet BS.