MSNBC vs Tulsi Gabbard

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I don't trust any source. I assume every source has a bias and is telling me something that has various levels of truth.

In the end I blame nothing on the MSM, they are a business and a propaganda outlet, just doing what they are supposed to do. I blame the US population for not doing their due diligence.

a reply to: pavil

Her response was way too smoothly given.

This entire thing looks totally scripted to me.
Fascinating. I bet the interruptions and bickering was scripted too.

Imagine what that means if that's really what's happening with all this?
That means the whole thing is a psyop. And most people think it's genuine and real.

Start the video over and watch how Tulsi was so completely ready for this "attack".
She was way way too ready and her whole line of rhetoric was not spontaneous - it was rehearsed... read off a teleprompter.
Watch her eyes moving back and forth like she's reading... wow!

Our whole system is fake. TV is a show...

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: pavil

Her response was way too smoothly given.

This entire thing looks totally scripted to me.
Fascinating. I bet the interruptions and bickering was scripted too.

Imagine what that means if that's really what's happening with all this?
That means the whole thing is a psyop. And most people think it's genuine and real.

Start the video over and watch how Tulsi was so completely ready for this "attack".
She was way way too ready and her whole line of rhetoric was not spontaneous - it was rehearsed... read off a teleprompter.
Watch her eyes moving back and forth like she's reading... wow!

Our whole system is fake. TV is a show...

They have done the same line of attack numerous times in interviews, I would hope she has her response down pat. I am sure it's not spontaneous, I've heard her give the same response almost verbatim after the other times it was brought up.

Go back and look at other news interviews she's given. Many bring up Assad and she eventually got her response down pat.

You going to blame her for doing that?

What good does of "Psyop" of that do for either side? She's just now fully prepared for the question

originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: pavil

I've gotten the impression she's good at being who people want her to be, depending on the crowd she's talking too. Just another politician and nothing special and certainly no moderate by any stretch.

She was Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee from 2013 to 2016 and then she resigned to endorse Sanders for 2016. She's way far Left and I think she's way left of what she admits.

Her following I think has more to do with her being attractive and former military. People should be asking her why she supported Sanders and the extreme Left socialists.

Fair points, but still her #1 point I like about her compared to the other Democrats is this: It's obvious the DNC really doesn't like her much anymore since her support of Sanders. She's on the outside now. If the Democratic Party is to evolve, it won't be from within and I sure hope it's not the Justice Democrats. For better or worse Gabbard has support from strange sources as evidenced even here on ATS. From a Republican aspect I would venture she ranks higher in favorablity than most Democrats. That means something down the road.

She probably won't even make it to the next debate. Should we be happy about that? Given the other Democrat alternatives for the nomination, I'd pick her.

a reply to: pavil

She's not a moderate; she's pretty loudly a progressive. So I'm not sure why people are surprised or pretending to be shocked that she's not moderate. But she's not a robot or a purist zealot. She's capable of finding and building on common ground. That is about the best we can hope for coming out of the left.

She also doesn't have a chance, so it's sort of moot.

Big R0n Paul follows Tulsi on twitter.
to me, that says a lot.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard’s campaign just announced that they have reached the 130,000 donor threshold.

That's one of the 2 thresholds to make it to the next debate.

Kamela very mad........

a reply to: pavil

She is not their choice. If she somehow got the nomination you think she would stay on the outside looking in? Why would she? All her policies are in line with the progressives. She is not the one they picked to fight Trump, but she is most certainly one of them.

a reply to: pavil

I see she accused Trump of supporting Al Qaeda. She's just another hate spewing partisan, like all the rest. She's in the divide to control camp, just like all bad politicians.

a reply to: pavil

I like both Tulsi Gabbard, and Trump. Yeah, I am one of THOSE people.

I hope they don't run against each other, for my own sake, because that would force me to make a very difficult decision to support one vs the other. I prefer Tulsi Gabbard on everything except healthcare, where she sucks (single payer).

If she could ditch her single payer stance, she would be a no brainer, for me at least.