High Court Finds Tommy Robinson guilty of contempt of court over Facebook broadcast

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Whatever.

Who are you going to appeal to now when your authority is lying? You can’t do Anything. All you can do is put your fingers in your ears.

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

I'm doing that now. There's this annoying whining, you see?

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

I'm doing that now. There's this annoying whining, you see?

Deflection and adhominem. And you’re a lawyer?

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Actually I am just bored of you keeping repeating stuff. Read the Judgment.

a reply to: YouSir

You Sir should be reading and posting FACTS, not spouting Rubbish, and spreading the lies that people like Lennon spread.

as posted by Gortex further up on page 1 of this thread…

Twenty men have been found guilty of being part of a grooming gang that raped and abused girls as young as 11 in Huddersfield...….

If this was about justice then Lennon should have waited till all the defendants had been tried and found guilty but it wasn't about justice, it was about Lennon's ego, and creating hate.

The judges clearly lied, or are just idiots, one or the other. This lie is easily proven false just by watching the offending video itself: Tommy Robinson encouraged vigilante action, judges say

Go to 11:50 of this video and see for yourself, because the court’s defenders are out in full force.

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Lennon put at risk a string of court cases, and his actions were stupid. If he had waited till all the cases had been seen, then none of this would have happened, it's that simple.

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

More lies, I suppose?

“We are entirely satisfied that [Robinson] had actual knowledge that there was an order in force restricting reporting of the trial,” the judges concluded. “He said as much, repeatedly, on the video itself.”

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Lennon put at risk a string of court cases, and his actions were stupid. If he had waited till all the cases had been seen, then none of this would have happened, it's that simple.

That’s all you guys have is repeating the judgement of proven liars.

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

More lies, I suppose?

“We are entirely satisfied that [Robinson] had actual knowledge that there was an order in force restricting reporting of the trial,” the judges concluded. “He said as much, repeatedly, on the video itself.”

More evidence you did it watch the video and are taking lying judges words on faith.

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick
9 months jail for next to nothing, eh? Wow. The UK used to be a beacon of liberty. Not so much any more.

He got a new t-shirt too...

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

And all you are repeating is the lies of Lennon and his ego rubbing rubbish. There were 20 or so cases going on at the time, that were all linked, and by jeopardizing one, it jeopardized all of them, it could have been used to get these scumbag child molesters out.

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick
9 months jail for next to nothing, eh? Wow. The UK used to be a beacon of liberty. Not so much any more.

He got a new t-shirt too...

edit on 11/7/19 by djz3ro because: Gimme a [ (and a ])

Authoritarians can’t meme.

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Proven liars? Have you forgotten that Yaxley-Lennon has convictions for, amongst other crimes, fraud?

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

And all you are repeating is the lies of Lennon and his ego rubbing rubbish. There where 20 or so cases going on that were all linked and by jeopardizing one, it jeopardized all of them, it could have been used to get these scumbag child molesters out.

Maybe if you repeat the judgement of liars 10 more times it will become true.

a reply to: Kurokage

Ah, but to some Yaxley-Lennon is more important to them than that sort of stuff.

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Proven liars? Have you forgotten that Yaxley-Lennon has convictions for, amongst other crimes, fraud?

Deflecting to an unrelated case now. Brilliant. You’re a lawyer?

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

And it doesn't matter how many time you repeat the lies of Lennon, it will never make it true.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

And it doesn't matter how many time you repeat the lines of Lennon, it will never make it true.

I’ve never repeated anything of Robinson. But don’t let the truth get in the way.

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

So it's OK for you to call Judges "proven liars" but not for me to point out that your boy is most definitely one?

That's deflection, is it? No, it's you having double standards, that is.