It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut
Wait till you find out WHO the "Dossier" is really about (hint: not Trump)
π₯π€«π₯
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".
Ooh La La π₯
Maybe when Mueller was in Russia "delivering" those Uranium "Samples" π₯
Ooh La La π₯
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".
Ooh La La π₯
Maybe when Mueller was in Russia "delivering" those Uranium "Samples" π₯
Ooh La La π₯
a reply to: chr0naut
Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut
Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement.
so says the "official" report π
What "Wikileaks" cable?
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut
Too bad it's never been "officially" proven true eh π
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut
Too bad it's never been "officially" proven true eh π
Parts have been proven true. Parts have been disproved.
The Mueller report, for one, while not mentioning the dossier by name, details several of the document's allegations, proving some and disproving others.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut
Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement.
so says the "official" report π
What "Wikileaks" cable?
Oops, forgot to paste the link. I've gone back and fixed it now.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".
Ooh La La π₯
Maybe when Mueller was in Russia "delivering" those Uranium "Samples" π₯
Ooh La La π₯
10 grams of uranium, that was forensic evidence for testing.
To give you an idea of how innocuously small this is, you'd require 50,000 grams to make an atomic bomb.
There are schools that have that size sample of Uranium in their science departments.
Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement, to verify the source of the smuggled Uranium.
Judging by other investigations and how they work if durhams investigation had anything on anyone we would now it by now.
That's not to say that they wont find something just that it 's safe to assume that they haven't found anything yet.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
There have been a ton of revelations about "SPYGATE"
Its hard to make revelations about something that doesnt and never existed.
This is all tyrant trumps imagination or more likely lies and fabrications that dont contain a scintilla of truth.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
There have been a ton of revelations about "SPYGATE"
Its hard to make revelations about something that doesnt and never existed.
This is all tyrant trumps imagination or more likely lies and fabrications that dont contain a scintilla of truth.
ππππππ
Youβre beginning to realise you were brainwashed arenβt you
Is it frightening you how easy you were manipulated yet?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Where did he say that? They all know that the alt right claims being made about U1 are not what happened.
Thats bull.
If he said that he is just playing the conspiracy theory game because no uranium ever went to Russia or ever will. Not from the sale of that company. Its been proven over and over again that is was only licensing that was sold.
NO URANIUM FROM THOSE TWO MINES IS ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE UNITED STATES.
So if he made any kind of reference to danger he's going to have to explain exactly what he thinks that danger is.