It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
precisely timed detonation of an incendiary device or devices in the central core at the exact moment the plane struck?
Katie Bender's family commemorate 20 years since Royal Canberra Hospital implosion
www.canberratimes.com.au...
Katie was was killed instantly by a steel fragment sent flying from 430 metres across the lake. It was thought to be travelling at 140km/h.
originally posted by: neutronflux
And where is the demolitions shrapnel from such an even?
Any shrapnel attributed to demolitions? Pulled from the injured or dead?
It’s coming from a vent. An explosive device capable of cutting core columns would not be contained by the sheet metal of a vent.
Why would an “incendiary device” create a pressure wave. You need to clearly state if you think an explosive device cut columns by pressure wave.
Or if you think pyrotechnics burnt through a column. And state what chemical compound was used.
Correct me if I am wrong. The initial shockwave from the impact and fuel exploding would travel through the air / structural at the speed of sound.
There is no evidence above the impact points the core was damaged.
originally posted by: neutronflux
I watched the video a few times. The jet hit late 1:09 into the video, or early 1:10. The dust coming out of the vents at the top of the tower didn’t exit until late 1:12 or early 1:13.
You do understand there is a whole field of metallurgy? That describes what happens to metal in terms of grain boundary, or crystalline structure. And deals in defined failure modes of steel. Like brittle fracture, or fatigue?
What failure mode is jet hole? And how does it affect the grain boundary and crystalline structure of steel?
This is the fourth forensic investigator that stated this looks like damage from a high explosive charge.
Irrelevant and a weak argument because it would be impossible to determine either way where "shrapnel" came from in the aftermath.
originally posted by: samkent
Precision is elusive in CD.
There are far too many vids on YT showing CD gone wrong.
You can try to fabricate a conspiracy around any of the small events that day.
But when you add all the events together a grand conspiracy falls flat.
The biggest thing is you don't need to kill 3000 people and flatten some of the
largest buildings in the US to get us into a war.
Explosions create pressure waves. Where did I say columns were cut by a pressure wave? Do not put words in my mouth.
The top blowout from the elevator shafts due to a precisely timed detonation of an incendiary device or devices in the central core at the exact moment the plane struck?
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MoonMine
You
Irrelevant and a weak argument because it would be impossible to determine either way where "shrapnel" came from in the aftermath.
Shrapnel is well studied and very distinctive from explosive cutting steel. It’s been studied for decades by the military. Any doctor that treated combat injuries would be familiar with its characteristics. It would be party the coroner reports on recovering and identifying remains. Cause of death.
The hospital implosion killed that poor girl over 400 meters away, and was less than ten floors tall. How far should demolitions cutting core columns spray shrapnel from a 110 floor building?
originally posted by: neutronflux
You need to make up your mind. Incendiary devices cut by burning, not by pressure wave. Incendiary devices would not cause the event you are concerned with.
At 1:10 impact - "Holy Sh.."
At 1:11 Less than one second after impact a cloud of dark grey smoke comes out of the top floor on the front and the top floor to the left. Look closely when the blowout on the top floor occurs.
Katie Bender's family commemorate 20 years since Royal Canberra Hospital implosion
www.canberratimes.com.au...
Katie was was killed instantly by a steel fragment sent flying from 430 metres across the lake. It was thought to be travelling at 140km/h.
originally posted by: neutronflux
Are wrong on the 1:11
And didn’t answer:
Correct me if I am wrong. The initial shockwave from the impact and fuel exploding would travel through the air / structural at the speed of sound.
If shockwaves from the jet impacts and fuel explosion pushed in to vents leading out of the building, the shockwave would travel through the vents at the speed of sound. Is that false.
originally posted by: democracydemo
a reply to: neutronflux
You do understand there is a whole field of metallurgy? That describes what happens to metal in terms of grain boundary, or crystalline structure. And deals in defined failure modes of steel. Like brittle fracture, or fatigue?
Yes.
What failure mode is jet hole? And how does it affect the grain boundary and crystalline structure of steel?
Very high pressure gas to a surface. Breaks the surface and leaves a hole you see.
This is the fourth forensic investigator that stated this looks like damage from a high explosive charge.
Emphasized on Fourth.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MoonMine
What are you ranting about?
How would an incendiary device create the event you are concerned about?
originally posted by: MoonMine
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MoonMine
What are you ranting about?
How would an incendiary device create the event you are concerned about?
Explosive device. Happy? Or.should I.spell.it.out.for.you. I correct my statement from incendiary to explosive ok?
Are you going to post the same things over and over again hoping for a different outcome?
That's the definition of insanity isn't it?