Reps. Schiff, Jordan agree that Robert Mueller should testify before Congress

a reply to: Sillyolme

Thanks and yes I do attempt to form an opinion in lieu of MSM. Another good book on the Justice Department players in Washington was written as:

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice Hardcover – May 1, 2014 by Sidney Powell

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice Hardcover – May 1, 2014
by Sidney Powell

I once participated in that system which in my opine based on what I saw it is as described in the Sidney Powell book. I once sat in a Federal Court room for over an hour with my attorneys after being summoned and then berated by a Republican Judge for simply going public on CNN to simply save my own life. My attorney then gently reminded the judge that we aren't the defendants. That judge still serves on the bench today. I am still here and that's why people go public. That's why I don't believe in Mueller or Comey and that's simply my story. It also haunts me to this day that the other guy who had the "black book" evidence was so overwhelmed by the corruption we encountered at the Federal USDOJ level that he took his life with a shotgun. He was a vet and committed no crimes. He only wanted that justice be served and did that after being interviewed by Congressional Investigators for the Dingle Committee. I guess they made an impression on him as they attempted to destroy all evidence he provided but he fooled them in death. He made copies.

a reply to: [post=24406750]Sillyolme[/po

Lol, I do not assume anything. I watch Cspan since returning to the idiot box 5 years ago. I watched them make Hillary squirm and deflect during the Banghazi trials etc. I watched today as they had a discussion about how many illegals are getting into our country, when they talked about the dog rapist who should have never been here how it used to 1 out of 2 then 1 out of 4 now it is we have no guess because it's so many. Trusting anyone's statistics is futile as they say whatevr the presenter wants them too. It is sad that more do not watch cspan but it is not "entertaining" enough for them and does not pander to partisan politics thus not re-affirming their political biases. At least you read that part but since that was the extent of your comment I hypothesize that you did not read the rest. Must not have had time to read how everything is nothing but a distraction and what we say think or even do doesn't mean squat to those that manipulate everyone. Did you watch during the B trials if so did you miss the e-mail where she advised her daughter and the head of some country it was a terrorist attack? That was right after it occurred. Nothing about the"video" that they tried to indoctrinate us with. Why did she feel the need to share that with her daughter? Did her daughter have security clearance? Speaking ill of cspan is not a way to increase viewership.