It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zabilgy
even if there were no proof to claim this theory i believe it. WHY? because no matter what.. if someone really does find proof and does present it to people there are always those types of people who wont believe in it and would probably find a reason to claim its a hoax. IMHO.. these non earthly humans are probably real......
I obviously agree....If God created us in His image, and there is life on other planets that he created, wouldn't it make logical sense that they would look like us and also be considered human. As I stated earlier, we are Earthlings.....but why couldn't there be "humans" on other planets?? We say we are human and then such and such an alien is a Pleiadian....well, in that case, we would be Earthlings and they Pleaidians. But I believe as a race, we would both be considered human!! Some humans on other planets will be more advanced and some less based on where they are at in evolution.
It's a great topic and I'm loving the discussion on it!!.....
[edit on 4-3-2005 by Zabilgy]
Originally posted by Zabilgy
Also known as "human-type aliens"
IT IS THEORIZED that the group consists of three peoples from three distinct colony zones, namely Sirius, Pleiades and Orion. Genetically, they are nearly identical to Earth-born humans. Tall, extremely fine featured, pale in complexion. Eyes are almond shaped, slightly slanted with a natural black liner, much like the renderings of ancient Egyptian royalty.
There are three hair colors apparently related to colony origin: blonde (Pleiades), red (Orion), and black (Sirius). The insignia of these combined human races is a triangular arrangement of three spheres. This symbol has deep significance, and is found throughout Earth history.
Home System : Taygeta Pleades, Vega Lyra, Sol, Sirius, Arcturus, Tau Ceti, Wolf 424, Procylon, Alpha Centauri
info found at: aliens.monstrous.com...
These are the THEORIZED type of aliens considered Non-Earth born:
Nordics
Pleiadians
Blues
Lyrans
Janosians
Hyadeans
Ummites
Vegans
Bernarians
Korendians
I've heard of Pleiadians and Vegans, but the rest of these are knew to me. I even had a psychic tell me I was a Pleiadian in another life. She feels and so do I that we can reincarnate to other planets not just to Earth over and over again.
Is anyone familiar with all these types of non-earth humans??
(Editted for the Moderator)
[edit on 2-3-2005 by Zabilgy]
If thats not disgustingly ignorant and racist, I don't know what is.
Originally posted by Valorian
The black races are from Earth itself, made by genetic manuplulation for labour (original work force for deep Gold extraction some 400 000 yrs ago)
You people. You spew all this garbage, and when its time for you to back up your beliefs, you pretend the burden of proof magically doesn't apply to you.
Originally posted by Valorian
mmmm, ignorance is not one of my ways my friend...
if you look and have an interest then your shall find out about these things.
You should see what the white races have been used for over the years, so pls refrain from implying my ignorance on these matters until you KNOW
Valorian
How conveniant!
Originally posted by Valorian
I dont argue either it wastes my time
see ya on the flip side myy friend
:-)
I'm all for knowledge. I appreciate you doing something most people like you do not do. You provide me with a way to attempt to understand what you believe in.
Originally posted by Valorian
I cant help but to analyze! LOL
Originally posted by Valorian
reply to post by prototism
Its the very least i could do, but do try and get to read these as they have an energy and vibration that may hold true to you and what you believe in presently.
these books are not for analysing but try to just read and let the words make sense.
if you meditate or even just contemplate then do that after reading these and see what you find out about who and where you are.
Val
Another one. Ignorant on the concept of the burden of proof. You have no point on being on this message board either, for the very same reason Val doesn't.
Originally posted by -zeropoint-
My soul is from the star system of Sirian, and no, I will not neither will I want to offer "proof" to anyone, and if you want more information do your own personal research.
Originally posted by prototism
I cant help but to analyze! LOL
Originally posted by Valorian
reply to post by prototism
Its the very least i could do, but do try and get to read these as they have an energy and vibration that may hold true to you and what you believe in presently.
these books are not for analysing but try to just read and let the words make sense.
if you meditate or even just contemplate then do that after reading these and see what you find out about who and where you are.
Val
But I know what you're saying. I have to put myself in a different place mentally/spiritually/etc, to better allow the "energy" to "flow". Or something like that.
Originally posted by prototism
Another one. Ignorant on the concept of the burden of proof. You have no point on being on this message board either, for the very same reason Val doesn't.
Originally posted by -zeropoint-
My soul is from the star system of Sirian, and no, I will not neither will I want to offer "proof" to anyone, and if you want more information do your own personal research.
But at least he gave me some sort of starting point.
[edit on 11/12/2008 by prototism]
Originally posted by prototism
Another one. Ignorant on the concept of the burden of proof. You have no point on being on this message board either, for the very same reason Val doesn't.
Originally posted by -zeropoint-
My soul is from the star system of Sirian, and no, I will not neither will I want to offer "proof" to anyone, and if you want more information do your own personal research.
But at least he gave me some sort of starting point.
[edit on 11/12/2008 by prototism]
Angry? Hardly. I'm simply pointing out the fact that you are ignorant on the concept of the burden of proof, which by the way, you didn't deny.
Originally posted by -zeropoint-