It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Tartuffe
I said conduct, not speech.
My speech is part of my public conduct in that example. You don't really stand for unrestricted free speech in any of your incarnations, it's just a talking point.
You made it clear you are for restricting speech if someone behaved in the manner I outlined.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
I am for restricting conduct if it interferes with the freedom of others.
originally posted by: schuyler
Your free speech stops at your property line. Forcing your neighbor to listen to your noise is disturbing the peace. Calling people names and intimidating them when they are on their own property is harassment. "Free speech" means that the Federal government cannot make a law abridging your right to speak IN A PUBLIC FORUM. I don't see a public forum here. Your claim is nothing more than hyperbole.
originally posted by: midnightstar
your freedom of speech ends were my ( Or her peace of mind begins )
The right of free speech comes with the responsibility of SELF censoring .
people who say OOO i can call you a a## or say FU and to bad its free speech need a good a%% kicking
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
Well I imagine disturbing the peace by playing your music too loud is a thing everywhere.
Yes, exactly. I think the OP is trolling. Making a public nuisance is not the same as "free speech".