It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: Trillium
No, ML just didn't include the url. Here it is...
threadreaderapp.com...
Ratcliffe said 13 of Clinton’s mobile devices were “lost, discarded, or destroyed with a hammer.”
originally posted by: butcherguy
Let's see if anyone turns up dead soon.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Ratcliffe said 13 of Clinton’s mobile devices were “lost, discarded, or destroyed with a hammer.”
So some of her devices, chock full of Top Secret information, maybe even her Blackberry, which we now know was infected with a virus.... were 'lost' or 'discarded'!
Not worrisome at all, eh?
My god the amount of "data" is Ginormous!!!
The data center is alleged to be able to process "all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Internet searches, as well as all types of personal data trails — parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital 'pocket litter'."[7] In response to claims that the data center would be used to illegally monitor email of U.S. citizens, in April 2013 an NSA spokesperson said, "Many unfounded allegations have been made about the planned activities of the Utah Data Center, ... one of the biggest misconceptions about NSA is that we are unlawfully listening in on, or reading emails of, U.S. citizens. This is simply not the case."[4] This statement was made two months prior to the document leak that revealed the existence of the PRISM program (below). Some members of the public question the credibility of official statements like Bamford's, above, in light of the revelations made in the following two paragraphs herein, and in light of the revelations made in the following two months after his statement was made.
originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth
Just throwing this out there. I don’t really know.
We were told in Horowitz’s report she had more than one email address, right?
So if the email accounts were deactivated, the question becomes were all of them?
Another factor would be the difference between an email account being hacked vs. the server. Wasn’t it the server?
Lastly, the records seemed to show (discussed earlier in last thread) the accounts were transferred from Platte River Networkd to Marcum-something, right? When did that occur?
I guess I’m asking, do we know if PRN was hosting the server when the alleged hack took place, or had it been transferred?
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
Yes, everything I posted earlier and commented on is regarding the SERVER that the email account was created and/or administered on. There could be thousands of individual email addresses on a single server.
Q !ITPb.qbhqo
22 Nov 2017 - 1:46:36 AM
Why are China & Russia communist S/closed?
Can you find an owl / Y there?
Was this to prevent evil from entering?
Was this to protect their children/people?
Why was BO shamed during trip to China, SA, other locations?
How was POTUS hosted?
Compare.
Think.
Fantasy land.
Q
originally posted by: Skada
Just to throw this out there, in regards to Gmail, well, google in general. Our Org uses Gmail for our .edu. Nothing is deleted. We have "the archive" of every mail sent and received within our org. With Gdocs, they have every version ever created back to the original creation of docs, sheets, presentations. So, if Google can do that, the Utah Data Center should as well.
Some perspective to the "We Have it all", statement.