It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
so there are definitely ways for geologists to identify what type of rock or meteorite they are looking at.
This forum is a platform to bring knowledge, research, to the table to be debated, argued, so that the ultimate truth may be discovered, if I'm not mistaken
.
in my opinion is very limited in scope.
I am not closed minded. Except to say I believe Dr S Warren Carey was, is, on the right tack.
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
Its all about the observation. Not, the theory! Its about facts, not assumptions. But, they all have their proper place, and proper time. Subduction is a theory, not a fact.
Indeed. But subduction is a theory supported by lots and lots of observations, measurements and a huge amount of data from all those observations, studies and measurements which tend to support that theory.
Whereas you have: your beliefs. Which, if you don't mind me saying so, are a little....odd.
It is not I who is the arrogant "Ones". I simply call it like I see it.
Does that not sound just a tad arrogant and full of self importance, no?
Besides, if the type of subduction you claim to exist actually existed, there would be no mountains, for the pressure required to create the mountains, would have subducted itself...into, itself. Do we see mountain ranges?? Its a obvious choice.
The difference is, I allow for viewpoints outside of the main stream, or underground stream, as you prefer.
I also believe those "Observations" you mentioned being supportive of "Subduction" are actually misidentified and being misapplied.
What I know in my heart of hearts, is honesty, is the best policy! Dear.
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
The difference is, I allow for viewpoints outside of the main stream, or underground stream, as you prefer.
Yes, but due to your confirmation bias you only seem to allow for viewpoints that happen to agree with yours.
I am not talking about my opinion as having any particular weight, I am just going with the vast bulk of scientific knowledge whereas you claim it is wrong. Not only do you claim it is wrong, you also claim some vast and nefarious cover up.
So, there you go. As you are All Seeing I expect you probably know best, dear.
Do you use the same format that was used to control the population, to deprogram them?
How long does it take to deprogram a generation?
I'm no John Nash, for if I were, I would have already been subdued. But, just as John saw things that didn't "Add" up, so too, do I.
There actually is a coverup of not only history, but of our physical world as well. And I see it just as clearly as John did.
Knowing best? Full, absolute disclosure,ASAP! We don't have anymore generations to waist.
I love science that is free of corruption, mind control, and manipulation for dubious reasons. Do I really need to prove corruption exists within the scientific community? Especially, when it comes to Geology (Geodeology)!
I am ignorant to how my phone is put together and works, yeah I know the basics but the technical specs of how and why it works the way it does is beyond me, It must be the devils work, its all a deception to control my mind.