I was watching some MUFON youtube videos the other day and a recommended for you showed up called;
Uncharted Case Files with Ryan Stacey.
So I clicked on it and checked it out.
The first video was a bit unorganized at the beginning as the author got used to streaming his live channel.
But as he got situated he started digging into cases reported to Mufon that he was investigating.
There's a total of 20, 35 minute or so videos.
What I like about it is he's actually showing reported images and videos, applying various detecting tools to come up with designations.
and calling it what it is.
He's also got his hands in other paranormal reports.
The guys a Canadian private investigator and has his own company.
One of the most recent videos I was watching, he showed an email exchange between him and NORAD, in regards to the November 24th, 2018, in Nunavut,
Canada, were a Pilot reported a UFO during a flight.
He showed some of the tricks used by the government when it comes to FoI acts or requesting information.
He shows that they changed the case number - a total of 3 times now.
Check him out, he has a lot of neat stuff in videos.
He showed some of the tricks used by the government when it comes to FoI acts or requesting information.
Yes plenty of tricks of the trade out there and blatantly lying is another good one - John Greenewald Junior once exposed NORAD doing exactly that
when they denied collating CIRVIS Military pilot UFO reports - basically he went through the Canadian Access of Information act and presented them
with own documents.
Ive watched all of them since friday.
When he got to the Norad and Transport Canada stuff, I figured I had to show it to ATS.
Edit to add:
The first video is basically just him talking about what he plans on doing, a bit of background, but as the videos progress so does the level of
interaction.
Stick with them, they get really interesting.
Especially when he gets to the abduction video.
edit on 17-3-2019 by Macenroe82 because: (no reason given)
Absolutely man.
For example, he posted a video taken from a drone that a witness claimed videos an orb or UFO.
He plays it a couple times, addresses his live stream commenters asking what they think it is.
Then he references another video put together by another investigator showing a catalog of mistaken identities - all those UFO videos we look at as a
community and determine its a bird, or a bug.
Well he points out what to look for and if none of the anomaly’s fall into any of those groups, he will look into it further.
Using Scientific methods of angular size, other reports of something similar.
And he will straight up say if he’s determined if it’s an unknown.
But he exhausts all other potential possibilities - like a true investigator will.
One really interesting case he’s been talking about is an Alien Code.
A witness claims to have recollection of entities in her room.
And provided 3 pages of these odd symbols that she said came to her.
Some of the symbols look like alchemy symbols, others, I want ATS to try to decipher.
But ya, he’s a believer. Hence why he’s in this field.
But he does his due diligence on every case.
This video at 22:24 shows the symbols
edit on 17-3-2019 by Macenroe82 because: (no reason given)
Okay, I started watching from Ep 1, and was extremely disappointed for multiple reasons, none of them essentially to do with content - or rather the
content that existed between long, bumbling interruptions due to both inexperience with his own technology, and a style of presentation that actually
made him seem half-bored. The layout of the room behind him was woeful and cluttered, distracting us from the show's actual content - which was all
delivered in 360p whilst asking us to focus on documents he waved at the camera.
To be honest, it felt like a UFO show presented by one half of Beavis And Butthead in terms of skill and aptitude. Almost as if this was made at the
dawn of the internet! So it's no wonder that his YT Views struggled to get into double-figures.
HOWEVER... skipping through to Ep 4, suddenly it all starts to come together, resembling something vaguely professional as we switch from him gawping
at the camera looking bored... to actual documents we can see on screen, his own narration suddenly complementing the visuals as everything becomes
tighter and more focused. Despite the ongoing #tty resolution.
My advice, then, is avoid the car-crashes that are the first three eps, unless you have the patience and forgiveness of a saint.
But think about it... you either get the polished presentation that has the money and tech experience and professionalism behind it, or you get the
guy who does his due diligence who has nobody backing him and is starting on his own.
That said, I will likely take your advice. So thanks.