New A.G. William Barr is in Disbelief and Disgusted by U.S. Government Activities.

a reply to: carewemust

I never lobbyists would have complete total control of Congress.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: drewlander

originally posted by: Phage
All caps huh?

Sure. I believe it.

You wouldnt believe objective truth anyway. I knew people were scared about Barr when Mudd went on TV saying "Barr will crush the Trump administration" as if to scare Trump from appointing him.

You're right. This January 15th USA Today article was assurance to Democrats that William Barr was solidly FOR Mueller, which meant he's one of the "good guys".

www.usatoday.com...

That article shows Barr is for Mueller but also evident that he disagrees with every democratic platform issue aside from mj legalization.

This is the particular context i was speaking of:
Mudd says Barr will "crush" Trump administration

Sorry about mobile link.

a reply to: dfnj2015

A.G. Barr might be referring to the same "disgrace" that President Trump described today.

theconservativetreehouse.com...-161291

Summary: Mueller was appointed as Special Counsel to investigate Russian Collusion with the Trump campaign...for no good reason, except ENTRAPMENT.

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: BoscoMoney
a reply to: MisterSpock

Yeah I spose I better explain somewhat.

Nag: Verb. Harass (someone) constantly to do something that they are averse to.

I was thinking about clarifying the family guy reference.

The definition shouldn't be in question, but then again ATS these days SMH.

It was South Park.

....just sayin

a reply to: drewlander

Re: thehill.com...

Thank-you! Philip Mudd had good reason for saying that in January.

Mueller's top prosecutor, Andrew Weisman, had filed several sealed "insurance" indictments against Trump family members.

That's why liberal MSM and top Democrats in Congress are so adamant about Mueller/Barr releasing the full non-redacted, original Mueller report. And holding off on impeachment, unless "something is found". (wink)

But A.G. Barr removed those "insurance" indictments from the court system..and briefed top federal attorneys on his actions, during their recent big meeting.

So today, President Trump is following his son, and all of Congress in calling for a complete release of the Special Counsel materials...including interviews, depositions, etc..

a reply to: carewemust

Political theater.

Trump can order it released. He can declassify it all.

a reply to: Phage

I never said he couldn't.

hmmm. Are you at a St. Patrick's celebration tonight Phage?

a reply to: carewemust

I never said he couldn't.

So, why all the arm waving? Just do it.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Q never lies.
Or makes stuff up.

All hail Q. Q is the redeemer.

Well, he is something.. thats for sure.. no one can deny that

and most of us have been saying that there's something very rotten in the Obama Admin that is currently trying to perform a coup on 45.

so be as sarcastic as you like... doesnt change the facts

a reply to: carewemust

ATS members who follow the Mueller Investigation, and the Spygate scandal, what TABOO word or phrase was intentionally omitted from the Barr quote??

Perfidiousness, more than likely.

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: carewemust

ATS members who follow the Mueller Investigation, and the Spygate scandal, what TABOO word or phrase was intentionally omitted from the Barr quote??

Perfidiousness, more than likely.

I had to look that up! Perfidious = www.vocabulary.com...

Possibly...but since Barr and Trump seem to be more on the same page, with each passing week, some form of TREASON is most likely what fills in the blank.

a reply to: carewemust

I wasn't aware that Barr removed these indictments. That makes a lot of sense. Explains the delay in the report, and Pelosi backing off on impeeeeeechment.

originally posted by: drewlander
a reply to: carewemust

I wasn't aware that Barr removed these indictments. That makes a lot of sense. Explains the delay in the report, and Pelosi backing off on impeeeeeechment.

Yes.. The "loose canon" on Mueller's team was Andrew Weismann. A.G. Barr (there's that name again!) totally removed Weismann from the Special Counsel investigation this past week, and purged the "trap" indictments from the court system.

We'll see this week if Schiff and Pelosi are still as adamant about "Waiting to see the Mueller report", before deciding if Trump needs to be impeached.

But Schiff and Pelosi may have no clue as to what is REALLY happening behind the scenes, now that Weismann has been removed.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust

Political theater.

Trump can order it released. He can declassify it all.

RE: twitter.com...

When judge Andrew Napolitano told the truth about Obama using GCHQ (U.K.) to spy on Trump campaign officials and the President himself, it was like dropping a nuke. As you see from the comments at that link, Napolitano has not been the same since.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust

Political theater.

Trump can order it released. He can declassify it all.

RE: twitter.com...

When judge Andrew Napolitano told the truth about Obama using GCHQ (U.K.) to spy on Trump campaign officials and the President himself, it was like dropping a nuke. As you see from the comments at that link, Napolitano has not been the same since.

Ever since, he's been acting like he's being blackmailed 😎

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust

Political theater.

Trump can order it released. He can declassify it all.

RE: twitter.com...

When judge Andrew Napolitano told the truth about Obama using GCHQ (U.K.) to spy on Trump campaign officials and the President himself, it was like dropping a nuke. As you see from the comments at that link, Napolitano has not been the same since.

Ever since, he's been acting like he's being blackmailed 😎

Much like Michael Cohen. Mueller threatened to indict his wife, unless Cohen became a "cooperative" witness.

Sound familiar? - www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: carewemust

Something stinks about this...

"IN ALL MY YEARS, IN ALL MY LIFE, I NEVER WOULD HAVE THOUGHT FINDING A ROTTEN FISH SANDWICH WOULD BE POSSIBLE WITHIN THE HALLS OF THESE PRESTIGIOUS FEDERAL AGENCIES."



Sorry couldn't resist as that video is a classic!

Star and flag OP.

a reply to: Nucleardoom
LOL, that was great. Had to be Jussie's. So many things a sandwich can be.

a reply to: Nucleardoom


#HalfEatenFishSandwichesMatter

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: carewemust

"IN ALL MY YEARS, IN ALL MY LIFE, I NEVER WOULD HAVE THOUGHT _______________ WOULD BE POSSIBLE WITHIN THE HALLS OF THESE PRESTIGIOUS FEDERAL AGENCIES."

TREASON

We have our winner!



If not treason, I say it might be something like "party above country".