It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MyToxicTash
Is crude oil worth more than water per pint?.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: strongfp
The biggest issue, though, was that they did not diversify their economic base. They put the entire national resource into producing oil instead of producing food or anything else. That's why they have no food now; they have no money to buy it and no infrastructure to grow it.
Without sufficient money from capitalism, socialism cannot survive in a country dependent on the global economy. That's the kicker.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: toysforadults
There's much propaganda about Venezuela right now I wouldn't believe anything about it
originally posted by: strongfp
Socialism in today's world doesnt mean you reject the free market.
You honestly think a nation with massive amounts of oil wont sell it in the world economy? What do they do with it all? Spill it in the streets and hope it turns into food and water?
...
The answer is a society where the means of production—factories, mines, railroads, the energy sources, all things used to create new wealth—are owned publicly, not privately. And that means socialism—a society where private property has been abolished.
...
Private Property
Private property, to a communist, is not your shoes or toothbrush, or even your house.
Those things are called personal property and under socialism and under communism they continue to belong to workers in much the same manner as they do now.
When Marxists speak of private property under capitalism, it refers to the tools of production that should be owned by all of society, such as factories, lands, stores, mines and all those things that are gifts of nature or are built by many people over many centuries, but are now being monopolized by a few. These few don’t concern themselves with how many years of human labor went into their creation, just so long as they alone can reap profits from legal ownership of that property.
The goal of socialism is to increase personal property many times over, through the abolishment of private property.
...
Actually, people seem to believe that oil, it's viscosity, is all the same all over the world, and it isn't.
There are types of oil that they almost look like to be mixed with water, because they are very thin and has a viscosity almost similar to water. Other types of oil/petroleum are very thick. Their viscosity varies depending of where you are drilling.
In the following video you can see the more liquid oil which looks like what is coming out of the faucet in places in Venezuela.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
At about 1:50, you can see where water will also not mix with oil. That's what I meant when I said that oil is not water-soluble.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
There is also the question of why anyone would go to the time and expense and trouble to purposefully connect oil lines to water lines. In typical infrastructure, there is no such connection because there is never a time when one would need to switch water lines to oil lines. Doing so would contaminate both the oil and the water, rendering both commercially nonviable. Waste water treatment, however, does have a connection to the water lines, because the water you receive in your home is water that was previously used and has been cleaned to be reused again. That allows a treatment plant to produce many times the water as one which is totally reliant on fresh water for its supply.
I stand by my original assertion that what we are seeing is likely partially treated sewage caused by a lack of containment when the treatment plants lost power for an extended period.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
...
When these things happen in other countries we're told it's because they don't love capitalism enough and they need to be saved by military force.
When they happen in the US we blame the victims and then just sweep the whole thing under the rug.
originally posted by: Puppylove
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: strongfp
The biggest issue, though, was that they did not diversify their economic base. They put the entire national resource into producing oil instead of producing food or anything else. That's why they have no food now; they have no money to buy it and no infrastructure to grow it.
Without sufficient money from capitalism, socialism cannot survive in a country dependent on the global economy. That's the kicker.
TheRedneck
This is exactly it. Is why I'm always arguing that any country who wants to be truly independent and free needs to FIRST make sure that in an emergency the country can close it's borders and provide for all the NEEDS of it's citizens. The ONLY thing a well built and established country should rely on trade for is WANTS. Other wise Venezuela can happen.
I never wrote that anyone connected oil pipes to the water pipes. However...
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
First of all, according to these numbnuts the store that your father started, and in which he, you and your son have been working at everyday for over 50 years doesn't belong to you, or to your father... Under socialism that store your father started with his own money 50 years ago "are gifts of nature or are built by many people over many centuries...