The House Democrats violate their own rules of The USA in Cohen hearing.

originally posted by: Extorris
a reply to: Violater1

It was a rule, not law and they voted to move forward as the "rules" permit.

You seem not aware of the difference between a rule (which was followed) and the law.

The Law makes it illegal to not disclose campaign contributions to pay off porn stars or accept things of value from foriegn governments to assist in your campaign.

Even "individual 1" is aware of the difference.

Please provide the rule or law, that states that the committee can vote on cancelling this rule.......

crickets.....

Sunday, March 3, 2019

Michael Cohen has no classified information. He has no security clearance. Why would the House Intel Committee (Adam Schiff) ensure that Cohen's next testimony (Wed March 6th) be behind closed-doors, in a secure setting?

Food for thought: video.foxnews.com...=show-clips

a reply to: carewemust

Because of the ongoing Muellar investigation.

originally posted by: Violater1

originally posted by: Extorris
a reply to: Violater1

It was a rule, not law and they voted to move forward as the "rules" permit.

You seem not aware of the difference between a rule (which was followed) and the law.

The Law makes it illegal to not disclose campaign contributions to pay off porn stars or accept things of value from foriegn governments to assist in your campaign.

Even "individual 1" is aware of the difference.

Please provide the rule or law, that states that the committee can vote on cancelling this rule.......

crickets.....

Maybe they got the idea from the Republicans.

After winning the majority after the 2010 election, Republicans used it 476 times in the 112th Congress. But by the 114th Congress, the House suspended the rules to pass bills 744 times – a 56 percent increase.

thehill.com...