It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
The women, most from China, were forced to live at the spa, sleep on the massage tables, cook on the back steps, and, most significantly, each woman was forced to service 1500 men per year.
Holy
Crap
This is per law enforcement.
Link
This is not harmless, and I don’t give a # about whether folks think the Johns are morally repugnant or righteous in the actual act. This is criminal trafficking of humans. Using this facility meant supporting/not giving a flying crap about the humanity and welfare of the women they used for their momentary pleasure.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Cravens
When is it right to fly in a high-class hooker and it wrong to frequent a low-rent rub-n-tug?? Good luck hurdling those logical obstacles you erected.
When one of them involves sex trafficking.
originally posted by: Willtell
The only reason I can think of why a billionaire went to a dollar hooker sex slave shop in a beaten up strip mall is he didn’t want to be recognized.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: interupt42
Okay. Decriminalizing prostitution is a discussion people can certainly have. It would definitely open it to regulation, and to determining trafficking victims vs willing participants in a fiduciary relationship.
In this case, law enforcement strongly indicated these women were being held against their will, and being coerced or forced into performing sex acts. I think these women qualify as victims, not because there are laws against prostitution, but because they are being forcibly required to perform sex acts for their keep.