It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seekerof
They have killed more innocent American's abroad than any other terrorist organization or group. They are responsible for the devastating suicide truck bombing of the U.S. Embassy in 1983, that killed 63 people. Six months later, they were responsible for another explosive-laden truck that was driven into the U.S. Marines barracks beside Beirut airport. The blast killed 241 servicemen.
Originally posted by Seekerof
The list can go on.
Originally posted by Seekerof
What is a freedom fighting organization to one is a terrorist organization to another and vice versa.
The terrorist organization that have killed innocent Americans more than any other terrorist group , is the American made "Al Qaeda"
It have never been prooved that Hizbollah are responsible for these attacks .
They are only US claims that are used in its propaganda .
Anyway I would love to see how you'll justificate the Marines' presence in Lebanon
And what is this list ?
A good example of how Hizbullah doesnt target innocents is the killing of the Israeli agent Akil Hashim . They had many opportunities to kill him before the last attempt .
They didn't trigger the bomb because he wasn't alone, at one time he is with his dog and at another time he is with his son. They wait till he is on his lonesome. (Ask Al Manar for the videos if you want) .
Unlike the Americans who were dropping in Afghanistan food packaging and cluster bombs that could hardly be told apart by innocents .
So , would you call France a terrorist state because they resisted the Nazi aggression ?
Any human will differentiate between terrorism and freedom-fighting , it is common sense , so use it .
If a terrorist is someone who kills innocent civilians, shouldn't the governments of America and Israel be at the top of the list?
Originally posted by Seekerof
Matter of the sources and whose looking at them, huh?
The U.S. was not the only nation who has claimed and asserted such. Bet.
You can twist it to suit your needs, but calling anything confirmed that you do not agree with nor have found as propaganda is just plain relative, eh?
Regardless of how I would choose to justify such, Hizbullah did the killing of those Americans and then claimed responsibility for it.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Coming from a pro-Hizbullah supporter, typical.
Let your fingers cruise the internet.
Let your feet walk to any decent well-stocked library.
Originally posted by Seekerof
One example of not out-right killing civilains out of how many that they did and have and still continue to do so? If you are smart enough to hire out your suicide bombers, etc., and are knowingly caught or publically called on it, please don't whine and cry and make excuses that your beloved Hizbullah does not do such indiscriminate killing, k? Your above illustration is lacking when placed in the larger picture of this organizations acts of confirmed and then claimed terrorism.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Unlike the Americans who were dropping in Afghanistan food packaging and cluster bombs that could hardly be told apart by innocents .
Humor?
Originally posted by Seekerof
On the level as Syria or Iran or Saudi Arabia? No.
As to France resisting, that may hold true, but I do recall Vichy France and its significant workings with the Nazis.
Originally posted by Seekerof
And you are exactly to be telling me that I am not using common sense? Am I supposed to fear you? Be scared of you?
Common sense is relative.
Its based on perspective: yours and mine.
If a terrorist is someone who kills innocent civilians, shouldn't the governments of America and Israel be at the top of the list?
Been discussed within ATS extensively. Common sense would thus dictate that one utilize this site's Search feature