It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For nearly two years now, the intelligence community has kept secret evidence in the Russia collusion case that directly undercuts the portrayal of retired Army general and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn as a Russian stooge.
That silence was maintained even when former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn was possibly “compromised” by Moscow.
...
Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA.
He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA.
When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources.
originally posted by: Grambler
As usual, take with a grain of salt until we can actually see the sourcve material.
According to John Solomon of the Hill.
While Sally Yates and the deep state mouthpieces in the msm were going around saying Flynn's dinner in Moscow may have made him a traitor, the CIA was setting on evidence that showed not only was this not the case, but Flynn himself helped the intel agencies by getting briefed and debriefed about the dinner by them.
For nearly two years now, the intelligence community has kept secret evidence in the Russia collusion case that directly undercuts the portrayal of retired Army general and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn as a Russian stooge.
That silence was maintained even when former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn was possibly “compromised” by Moscow.
...
Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA.
He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA.
When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources.
thehill.com...
Terrible as usual if true.
This means that the intel agencies were perfectly fine with the narrative of flynn maybe being a traitor with this dinner, because it helped fit their narrative of attacking Trump, even though they knew it wasnt the case.
You would think the media people spreading this narrative would now be investigating this story, seeing as how they spread what would be disinformation if true.
But nope, they arent interested ion being journalists (most of them anyway), they just want to push the Trump russia narrative, and if they report something that is not true, just jump to the next story.
originally posted by: carewemust
The evil Anti-Trump/Pro-Obama judge, T.S. Ellis, was dying to charge General Flynn with TREASON, but Mueller's prosecutors told him they did NOT want to do that.
Source: www.cnbc.com...
Then why did he not do that with Russia and Turkey contacts in 2016 and 2017?
originally posted by: Pyle
Cool, he follow protocol for his bewildering trip to a Russian government propaganda dinner in 2015?
Then why did he not do that with Russia and Turkey contacts in 2016 and 2017?
originally posted by: Pyle
Cool, he follow protocol for his bewildering trip to a Russian government propaganda dinner in 2015?
Then why did he not do that with Russia and Turkey contacts in 2016 and 2017?
originally posted by: Grambler
As usual, take with a grain of salt until we can actually see the sourcve material.
According to John Solomon of the Hill.
While Sally Yates and the deep state mouthpieces in the msm were going around saying Flynn's dinner in Moscow may have made him a traitor, the CIA was setting on evidence that showed not only was this not the case, but Flynn himself helped the intel agencies by getting briefed and debriefed about the dinner by them.
For nearly two years now, the intelligence community has kept secret evidence in the Russia collusion case that directly undercuts the portrayal of retired Army general and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn as a Russian stooge.
That silence was maintained even when former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn was possibly “compromised” by Moscow.
...
Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA.
He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA.
When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources.
thehill.com...
Terrible as usual if true.
This means that the intel agencies were perfectly fine with the narrative of flynn maybe being a traitor with this dinner, because it helped fit their narrative of attacking Trump, even though they knew it wasnt the case.
You would think the media people spreading this narrative would now be investigating this story, seeing as how they spread what would be disinformation if true.
But nope, they arent interested ion being journalists (most of them anyway), they just want to push the Trump russia narrative, and if they report something that is not true, just jump to the next story.
originally posted by: carewemust
The evil Anti-Trump/Pro-Obama judge, T.S. Ellis, was dying to charge General Flynn with TREASON, but Mueller's prosecutors told him they did NOT want to do that.
Source: www.cnbc.com...
And why isnt all of the people who were also lobbying for foreign governments, like the Podesta group, also charged, had their lawyers offices raided, all of their russian contacts investigated, wiretaps issued, etc?
originally posted by: liveandlearn
originally posted by: Pyle
Cool, he follow protocol for his bewildering trip to a Russian government propaganda dinner in 2015?
Then why did he not do that with Russia and Turkey contacts in 2016 and 2017?
And how do you know he didn't ?
2015 is just now coming out.