Angela Merkel defends UN migration pact, rejects 'nationalism in its purest form'

Part of every politicans job should consist of setting an example to their

electorate......those who voted them in?


There for they should be required to house the first influx of immigrants in their

yards/gardens (and I know that most of them have huge acres on their properties

one even has a moat which the electorate paid for getting cleaned) fiddled

expenses.

They can be housed in portable cabins, caravans or tents.


When they have done that ..... they will have first hand experience to impart to us

on immigration.

a reply to: AtlasHawk

What she is calling 'nationalism in its purest form' is isolationism not nationalism. I think they are campaigning against countries like Italy, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia going their own way. Mostly Italy.

a reply to: AtlasHawk

Angela Merkels " Puppet Strings " are Showing , the German People Will have to Grow a Pair Now .... "Deutschland, Deutschland über alles" !

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: AtlasHawk
This dangerous UN migration pact would grant African/Arab Migrants universal rights for migrants and not only that. Should this UN migration pact pass, you will no longer have a right to defend yourself or your loved ones if the migrants commit a crime in the host country.

Could you point to the articles of the pact that say that?

Here's the official document:

refugeesmigrants.un.org...

Preamble #4, page 2:

" Refugees and migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights and fundamental
freedoms, which must be respected, protected and fulfilled at all times. However, migrants and
refugees are distinct groups governed by separate legal frameworks. Only refugees are entitled
to the specific international protection as defined by international refugee law. This Global
Compact refers to migrants and presents a cooperative framework addressing migration in all
its dimensions. "

"OBJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public
discourse to shape perceptions of migration
33. We commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and
manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance
against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law. We further commit to
promote an open and evidence-based public discourse on migration and migrants in partnership
with all parts of society, that generates a more realistic, humane and constructive perception in
this regard. We also commit to protect freedom of expression in accordance with international
law, recognizing that an open and free debate contributes to a comprehensive understanding
of all aspects of migration. "

Last week Hillary Clinton said that Angela Merkel’s actions were “generous and compassionate”.

What a disgusting piece of sh#t.

European citizens have been simmering for a few years now in the hope leaders will act or come up with solutions to end or at least reduce the mass illegal immigration. But they haven't, and now citizens are at boiling point. Leaders don't even have a clue as to what to do with all the migrants that are already in Europe, most of them don't work, there's nowhere to for them to live or anything. Nothing to offer them but unemployment, homelessness, and poverty when they get there.

Yet they keep on bringing hundreds of thousands more of them in, but for what? This is why people are angry, they don't see leaders doing anything with them once they're here. They just bring them in and bus them around the continent, then apparently abandon them. Why would 'compassionate' EU leaders 'rescue' all those undocumented and mostly male foreigners just to offer them no life, no opportunities, no jobs, no homes, and no future? It's no good for the migrants and of no benefit to the countries they're dumped in either. None of it makes any sense.

Unless there's another reason they're being brought in.

It would make sense if, say, unseen powers are covertly installing hostile 'cells' around the continent, and leave them in place until such a time, and at the same time, they'll be called on to rise up and take over the communities they've been dumped/forced on/installed in. Is it possible that an entire continent could be taken this way? Unprepared citizens wouldn't be of much resistance. It's a better plan than overtly trying to invade a continent, they wouldn't stand a chance and wouldn't even get as far as setting foot on the beaches.

Coming in and swarming across every country in the continent in their hundreds of thousands, not only without any military or civilian confrontation, but actually enabled and assisted by leaders of those countries. Then just wait for the order.

A wealthy, powerful, and technologically advanced continent cannot easily be invaded and conquered. Not overtly. Absolutely not a chance. Just forget it. But could it be achieved covertly, such as under the guise of mass-migration and 'humanitarian' reasons?

Might all sound a bit far-fetched and all but I can see it waddling and hear it quacking and would swear it's a duck, but TPTB keep on telling us it's a chair.

a reply to: doobydoll

That's your viewpoint. It would be mine too if I lived there. In America, we get the impression that women hold a very different view. we always see signs "Refugees welcome" and large pro immigrant demonstrations consisting of mostly women. Rapes are not blamed on immigrants but on all men. We hear stories about Sweden; the female immigration officers are dating these people.

News here makes it sound like it's just what these women want. And since almost all of the European leaders are women also...

a reply to: toms54

And of course what those female immigration officers are doing is completely wrong and criminal. It seems they dont even care the fact that they would be even catching a few Sexually transmitted diseases from those migrants that they are dating?

News here makes it sound like it's just what these women want

Not all of the women and those women that want this seem to be suffering from a mental illness.

a reply to: stormcell

Thanks, I know where to get the document, I just wanted to know where were those articles that allow that we "will no longer have a right to defend ourselves or our loved ones if the migrants commit a crime in the host country".

originally posted by: doobydoll
It would make sense if, say, unseen powers are covertly installing hostile 'cells' around the continent, and leave them in place until such a time, and at the same time, they'll be called on to rise up and take over the communities they've been dumped/forced on/installed in. Is it possible that an entire continent could be taken this way? Unprepared citizens wouldn't be of much resistance. It's a better plan than overtly trying to invade a continent, they wouldn't stand a chance and wouldn't even get as far as setting foot on the beaches.

That could work in a country with no military and very high immigrant/local ratio, but I don't see it happening in any European country.

Another possibility I see is that those unseen powers chose this method to force a replacement of the governments in Europe by others in which they trust more, as the natural tendency would be for people to blame their governments instead of those unseen powers.