It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is Islamic culture so different that we truly do not understand it. That we judge Sharia based on what we see not on what we know. That from the outside it looks cruel and unusual but form the inside seen as the right way to live life in society? Alas we cannot and do not condemn Islamic values, just the way they deal with the punishment of breaking laws aimed at keeping values holy and sacred such as fidelity and honesty to name two.
Or is it that the oppressed cannot see out from under their literal veil of oppression and will choose to keep it over themselves out of fear of the unkown or out of conditioning and brainwashing?
That is pretty much it in a nutshell. It was painfuly obvious from the start and wanting to change 6,000 year old traditions of every Muslem annd have them conform to our ways will not work by force, it has to be done of their own accord. Those who want change seek it.
So is it opression and the cycle of it repeating and the women making sure it stays in place or is it actually we don't understand the different culture and view it from the outside as cruel and unusual.
I think we don't have a clue.
Sharia is a good idea, they say, if it is mixed with civil rights to guarantee they won't become second-class citizens. But Umm Hibba, who declined to give her full name for security and because it is sometimes considered inappropriate for a married woman, believes sharia is the only option. She has been told a secular government means one run by "infidels."
Ms. Abid says that, as a good Muslim, she supports sharia. But she likes a secular government and supports Allawi, who campaigned on his secularism.
Umm Sermat, who also would not give her full name, thinks Islamic law is a good idea but wants the protections she had under Mr. Hussein's secular regime. "The law [then] was with the women 100 percent," she says. A man "had to get his wife's permission to take a second wife. They should share the [assets] if the wife is separated. In a divorce, they have to prepare a furnished house for her.... We don't want a sharia constitution like the Iranian model. We're not worried about [UIA] being like Iran because it also includes (Ahmed) Chalabi, a Shiite" who is secular.
( emphasis mine )
Sharia is a good idea, they say, if it is mixed with civil rights to guarantee they won't become second-class citizens. But Umm Hibba, who declined to give her full name for security and because it is sometimes considered inappropriate for a married woman, believes sharia is the only option. She has been told a secular government means one run by "infidels."
BAGHDAD — Islamist extremists are targeting the city's universities by threatening and even attacking female students who wear Western-style fashions, setting off bombs on campuses and demanding that classes be segregated by sex.
"Shiite political groups want to impose Islamic sharia and let it override the civil code that we've had for 30 years. This will turn women not into second class citizens but into third and fourth class citizens," says Mohammed, who heads The Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq, which opened the first domestic violence shelter for women escaping abuse or "honor killings" from their families.