We have
connection self replicating of it's own
dot.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
The original dot is that there are peanuts on airplanes, correct?
The next dot would be that George Bush almost died from a friggin pretzel.
This demonstrates an obvious pattern of attempted assassination by use of salted snacks, which Bush could only gain plausible deniability for by
nearly becoming a victim himself.
You've invented a new aspect of game play Vagabond. A
fnord.
While the fundamental premise of the game is to
connect a given
dot to
The Bush Agenda (helping illuminate whatever that might be
over the course of play) then provide a typically
unrelated dot for the next player, you've done so with a
snark linking salty
airline snacks to the pretzel incident (a
bash all it's own), and provided the very
connection as the next
dot... a
Fnord
gambit.
Very sportsmanlike of you as it's an easy setup for a
conspiracy assist (linking three
dots.)
Note though as game play advances players will want to provide less obvious
dots (except in matters of strategy) as the goal is to increase the
difficulty level for your opponents while quietly directing game play to your own agenda of
conspiracy.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
This is ever so slightly more confusing than Survivor but I'll give it a shot.
Yes it is! Isn't it wonderful?
And we've just begun.
At heart this is
a conspiracy game merely using Bush Bashing as an anchor. In this version, the goal is uncovering the full gamut of
influence for the insidious
Bush Agenda. Conservative players should take note this has nothing to do with politics and give it a shot.
Furthermore, the ridiculous complexity of game play (hopefully increasingly so over time) should be familiar to fans of the drinking game
quarters, where random arbitrary rules are interjected at interval to an increasingly cumbersome
system of play that in effect
is the
game.
Self assuredness, not doubt, is key. But we'll go ahead and add the element of non-game play
Bah's now to help.
A
Bah is what I'm doing now. Any non-game play aside, interjection, propsal or question anyone wants to make. Even if it's just to
humbug the game and inform the players that we never talk to them anymore and they're breaking up with us.
We'll also go ahead and assign a game goal for completion of this
amateur edition. The first
SS maneuver ends it. Points are then
tallied by the current
Bash Master upon game end from among all the arbitrarily assigned points along the way ala
Who's Line is it
Anyway?. This assumes an obvious winner, not requiring the previously promised
show of democracy inaction, but that is a fallback
possibility.
Additional rules may be proposed at any time by anyone, but the current
Bash Master ultimately decides whether or not to incorporate them.
That's about the extent of the
Bash Master's power over game play though as they are limited to only making one new rule of their own
proposal per turn as
Bash Master. The
Bash Master gauntlet get passed throughout the game as
conspiracies are made. I'll serve
as
BM now, but we're close to our first conspiracy so it won't be for long.
No rules can be removed though. Just new ones added on.
While still
BM I suppose I'll make my arbitrary one now in the spirit of
quarters to help people get the idea.
No mentions of "Drink, Drank or Drunk." (an especially difficult rule to adhere to in
Bush Bashing). And I just earned a
snark
as well.
See? Getting it?
I'm trying to limit my play in the
amatuer edition here so I'll just make a quick pretzel connection to the
Bush Agenda then provide
the next
dot, without going for the three point
conspiracy leaving that open for the
BM steal.
###
Back to Game Play ###
The "pretzel incident" was most likely a "beer and pretzels" related
message from
August A. Busch IV, beer tycoon, unhappy both that Bush gave up
drinking so publicly and has such disasterous foreign relations policies stiffling American beer exports, which explains subsequent industry wide tax
cuts.
I know that knocks on your inside job set-up theory V. for plausible deniablity about the peanut genocide, but that's the risk of Fnord
play.
Next
dot: I'm sticking with
Nipplegate since it's already out there. (Another
snark for me!!!)
Okay, three
dots in the game so far...one open needing a
connection to continue, and no
conspiracies made. Remember the
Fnord was just a mini-conspiracy bonus between two
dots, not three. Next full
conspiracy gets the
BM chair.
NippleGate now needs a
connection to the
Bush Agenda, then we need another
dot to
connect. Also, if so inclined,
one may make a
peanut, pretzel, nipplegate conspiracy relationship exposing a higher level of the
Bush Agenda and steal the
BM, but don't forget to leave us a
dot.
I can't believe I just said that.
[Also edits not affecting game play are okay within the standard time window.]
[edit on 26-2-2005 by RANT]