1 photo - 1 fact

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Salander

Then it should be easier for you to cite sources there was no wreckage or no human remains. No large debris field? No personal effects collected?

Cite sources? It was 17 years ago, and like everybody else I watched it on TV as it happened. As everybody at the scene noted, including the coroner, there was nothing in that field that looked like a crashed airliner with passengers and baggage. Nothing at all.

It seems you are the type person who cannot see anything on your own. You need some government official to tell you what you see. Pathetic, but typical of so many Americans these days.

a reply to: Ghostsinthefog

Also, if you had to pick one fact that in your opinion is the ultimate proof there was a conspiracy what fact would you provide?

numerous people involved in planning and carrying out = conspiracy.

Most disturbing pics? people jumping to their death images.

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog

The spire.

A structural steel column that didn't melt or buckle, but turned to dust. This one fact disproves jet fuel and thermite in one swoop.

OMG

turned to dust? just because a crappy youtube video makes it look like that so many fall it.

don't forget to add the narrator of said YouTube videos guides to believing such nonsense without the spec of thought let alone critical thought about what claimed and what you have just thought you saw on video.

Its no wonder so many years later and we have threads like this asking what proves it was a conspiracy.

everything speculated that tries to explain the events of the day be it the official side of things or wild conspiracy theories.

They all point to conspiracy due to what the word means.

You say its a fact that the spire turned to dust.

facts have proof

please provide just some.

Does anyone else here honestly see "dust falling off a column"? Or do you see a column disintegrating into dust?

it certainly looks its turning to dust but is it really?


low resolution, youtubes process when uploading videos and whats done to the files could p[lay a part in making it look like what you are being told and looking at.

The spire simply falls after everything else has collapsed and its the dust that has settled on the spire along with the video quality that make it look like its turning to dust.


you say it is and that its a fact.

Prove it.

Except for the fact that the dust was so fine it floated away. This is clearly visible in all footage of 9/11.

so it should be extremely easy to prove then.

Get the you tube video of the spire turning to dust then find where that footage was taken from, a media source and find the original video that shows a sharper view that allows one to make out the spire falling and the dust acting as such due to the spire falling.

a reply to: InhaleExhale


Yes, it was most certainly a conspiracy. The only relevant question is just who the conspirators were.

19 arabs with box cutters it was NOT.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: InhaleExhale


Yes, it was most certainly a conspiracy. The only relevant question is just who the conspirators were.

19 arabs with box cutters it was NOT.

Who was backed by many rich and government Middle Eastern interests.

Not by the 19 terrorists as attested to by DNA evidence, coroner documents, ticket purchases, financial records, money trails, airport counter workers, intel, evidence recovered from homes/apartments, FBI records, immigration records, flight schools, simulator trainers, New York Police, various eyewitness, evidence of dry runs, emails, cockpit radio communications, accounts by airport staff.......

a reply to: Salander

You

As everybody at the scene noted, including the coroner, there was nothing in that field that looked like a crashed airliner with passengers and baggage.

What was a high speed impact of a jet mostly going in nose first supposed to look like? Seems your the type of person that thought the crash should look like a wile e coyote cartoon?

You

Nothing at all.

Got that from the corner? Again, cite where the coroner ever said there was no wreckage or human remains.