It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Erno86
Almost sounds like a threat.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Xcathdra
I can't fathom why they'd put an ISIS related emblem on the device
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Xcathdra
I can't fathom why they'd put an ISIS related emblem on the device
I can't fathom why my marines drew dicks all over the tank rounds...but they did... I think it's a brain thing lol too many crayons
A2D
See The Letter and Additional Analysis at: theconservativetreehouse.com...-1621 84
Everything about last year’s headline story just two-weeks before the mid-term election was weird; including the refusal of the FBI to state what ‘specifically’ was the material suspect Cesar Sayoc was accused of using to create his Acme-looking pipe bombs.
You might remember: FBI Director Christopher Wray outlined during his remarks that the devices consisted of PVC pipe, clocks, batteries, wiring and “energetic material that can become combustible when subjected to heat or friction”.
The FBI director went out of his way to state: “these were not hoax devices.” The DOJ case, which has taken places in New York’s Southern District (SDNY) then moved to seal all court filings and the case against the nut continued behind the curtain of ‘national security’.
In a new development Cesar Sayoc has written a letter to the judge (full pdf below) trying to walk-back the statements put before him by lawyers in his guilty plea.
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Lokiate
It came out in the indictment that they were not 'bombs'.