It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: neo96
Because it's nothing BUT supposition.
It is not a supposition, it is a theory backed by facts. Big difference.
On June14,2016 the Washington Post reported that Russian Hackers had broekn in to the Democrat National Comitte files and gained access to it's research on Donald Trump.
Bruh, you're the definition of off topic and derailment, more so, you try to perpetuate the Russo-Collusion myth, which is, imo, derailment from actual current evidence that shows otherwise. No, not Manafort, not Papa or any other fails by the inpet deepstate and dying liberal media.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Arnie123
Completely off topic attempt at derailment. Is that all you got?
1. Trump was a supposed Russian agent. Therefore there would have been no need.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
The whole Russian asset angle is the establishment’s birtherism.
One big difference is that Obama was able to produce his birth certificate but Trump refuses to publish his tax returns. He is obviously hiding something that could undo him.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: DJW001
Doesn't effing matter.
Fusion GPS,Perkins Coie,Orbis,Steele did the dirty work on that 'research'.
And ALL that so called intel came from the GD Russians to begin with.
Still trying to justify LIES.
Yes that's right... He has undeniable, unhidden proof of being a Russian asset in his tax returns... And if only the PUBLIC could scrutinize them, Joe Blow on the internet forums would surely out it to the world....
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CrawlingChaos
Yes that's right... He has undeniable, unhidden proof of being a Russian asset in his tax returns... And if only the PUBLIC could scrutinize them, Joe Blow on the internet forums would surely out it to the world....
The PUBLIC includes seasoned journalists, professional accountants, banking regulators, foreign police agencies... the PUBLIC deserves to give Trump's dirty little secrets a going over. There is probably no direct evidence of espionage, but plenty of liabilities that might be exploited.
lol, oh no sir.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Arnie123
And when you have no case to make, cry "TRIGGERED!" Sad.
TRIGGERED 😌
Damn you're too easy, right out the gates of the OP thread and you gunned right for me
Luckly, you can't zero for crap and are incapable of reading post for what they are, rather, over reaching to prove a nonexistent point as you always do.
Thanks for the attention hunny 😘
Anything else?