It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Otero County Sheriff Benny House, however, said FBI agents told him the observatory would be powered down for a few days.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: wylekat
What's the earthfiles link claim. Just curious. I know what's going on at the observatory but am interested in if she's (multon howe) is even remotely close to the truth.
originally posted by: wylekat
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: wylekat
What's the earthfiles link claim. Just curious. I know what's going on at the observatory but am interested in if she's (multon howe) is even remotely close to the truth.
She owes me an apology way back from the whole alien drone (the CARAT stuff) with the wacky writing on it fiasco. I was solidly convinced it was fake, and told her so and *why*. She told me I was an idiot, (politely, of course), and then, when it all tumbled out to be a hoax, I never got so much as a "...and the horse you rode in on" from her. I halfway take what she says with a grain of salt- this being an exception. Why would she, as much of a conspiracy person she is, go against the grain and claim the observatories in question weren't closed? Why wouldn't she jump on the bandwagon, wrong or not, and just decide something *was* up? Why take a complete and opposite stance from the people claiming that all of the observatories picked up something of an ET nature?
Gut feeling says she would be all over those closings and relishing every second of building mystery as to what was lurking supposedly out there. This took me by surprise.
originally posted by: wylekat
a reply to: SeaWorthy
If it is viral marketing the FBI are complicit it seems and I think that is a bit much to believe.
I am saying that the observatory is using the investigation as a springboard of sorts. The FBI isn't involved per se- but maybe some opportunist decided it was an opportunity too good to pass up. As long as the FBI probably isn't bugged directly, or like there's people dressed up LIKE FBI agents hassling anyone who wanders in, I bet they pretty much are looking the other way while they unravel their issue.
"Don't dress up like us, don't play FBI, and, well, do whatever. We're working on this thing."
originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: BASSPLYR
I don't think Linda molten cow knows what day of the week it is...dotys unsuspecting tag team partner..
Her website states that alot of observatories have been wrongfully reported as being down when they aren't. More left hand right hand stuff bass...
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Deetermined
That was back in May. And there's not a lot to see with their testing. They're only using dispersed sensors and aircraft to stimulate missiles.
In the live air test, IBCS demonstrated its ability to combine data from sensors and multiple information sources to accomplish simulated engagements of both real and simulated fixed-wing, rotary-wing, cruise missile and tactical ballistic missile targets.
Military aircraft such as F-15 and F-16 fighters and the slower-moving C-12 turboprop were used as surrogates, replicating the flight patterns of adversary threats along a flight corridor of the White Sands Missile Range.
The test was designed to evaluate various hardware and software functions of the Army’s future IAMD “system of systems,” of which Northrop Grumman’s IBCS is the centerpiece. Twenty major IBCS components were involved in the trial, including IBCS engagement operations centers and integrated fire control network relays.
The test had a number of key objectives, including: the exercise of launcher and sensor controls in a live environment; conduction of simultaneous simulated engagements of multiple aerial targets; integration with the Link 16 tactical data and Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) air traffic management networks; and contribution to the joint single integrated air picture.
originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: BASSPLYR
I don't think Linda molten cow knows what day of the week it is...dotys unsuspecting tag team partner..
Her website states that alot of observatories have been wrongfully reported as being down when they aren't. More left hand right hand stuff bass...
McAteer said his consortium assigns four researchers to the facility, although the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, another consortium, manages the buildings and other infrastructure with an additional four or five people. That consortium, McAteer said, had ordered the site vacated, providing no other reason than a “security” issue. He said the researchers did not spot anything in the sun to necessitate them leaving, nor were they aware of any scientific reason — such as an anomaly in the data they were collecting — for doing so.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Deetermined
Except that the signals would be fairly tight beam and directed. Not something easily intercepted unless you were along the transmission path.
The observatory is operated by New Mexico State University (NMSU) and owned by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC). Access to the telescopes and buildings is restricted, but the public is able to visit the grounds.