It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Deetermined
Here's something interesting. I found an article a moment ago where AURA made a statement that they were going to use this down time to go through their data logs over the last two months. Then I came across another article where someone in the comment section had this to say...
It’s an accidental breach of SIGINT security, the sensors this facility uses accidentally intercepted US military signals without knowing it and someone found out. The FBI was sent in to scrub the data and find out how it was done so either the signals or equipment can be modified. The government does not want the data in the open for intercept and analysts by enemy states.
The official story will be that a rival state was trying to steal science and technical secrets by hacking into research facilities. One of those hacks was traced to this facility and the FBI showed up to investigate. In a few days there will be an all clear with a stipulation that the FBI is able to leave software or a computer to scan network traffic to see if it happens again. Its a front to keep tabs.
gizmodo.com...
originally posted by: caterpillage
Here's an example of the type of pics the Dunn does, this one is not from the Dunn, but I like it cause it scales the United States in for a scale comparison.
I believe credit for the pic goes to Sweden.
"could not even return to get their pets"
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: KeithCooper
"could not even return to get their pets"
I don't think any pets were left to die. They may not have been able to take them to hotels but no way I believe they are just left up there.
Also, it would seem every worker there would be online and chatting I have seen one and two people who live in the area, not Sunspot. Maybe I didn't look hard enough but they are the witnesses and I would think they would be on everyone's radar.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
That is interesting but personally i doubt it. Military secrets travel on a system that erodes quickly and leaves no chance for decryption. Of coarse i could be confusing things here but from what i learned in the past it would take a whole team working in real time to even get a small glimpse at info. If that is the case then they would easily be able to find that group of people before any such decryption took place. It would be easier and cheaper to buy the secrets than to attempt decryption in real time.
Need for multiple, coordinated receivers
First, atmospheric conditions, sunspots, the target's transmission schedule and antenna characteristics, and other factors create uncertainty that a given signal intercept sensor will be able to "hear" the signal of interest, even with a geographically fixed target and an opponent making no attempt to evade interception. Basic countermeasures against interception include frequent changing of radio frequency, polarization, and other transmission characteristics. An intercept aircraft could not get off the ground if it had to carry antennas and receivers for every possible frequency and signal type to deal with such countermeasures.
Second, locating the transmitter's position is usually part of SIGINT. Triangulation and more sophisticated radio location techniques, such as time of arrival methods, require multiple receiving points at different locations. These receivers send location-relevant information to a central point, or perhaps to a distributed system in which all participate, such that the information can be correlated and a location computed.
Intercept management
Modern SIGINT systems, therefore, have substantial communications among intercept platforms. Even if some platforms are clandestine, there is still a broadcast of information telling them where and how to look for signals.
originally posted by: Fiscal
a reply to: Deetermined
People seem to like to present their theories as fact for some reason. I’m thinking that’s a theory, an interesting one no doubt, but various facets of that particular story have been discussed fairly heavily—though maybe not exactly like that.
originally posted by: ToasterBorst
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
Still hung up on the continued closure of post office w/ the publicity stunt angle, federal employees cannot just transfer locations on a whim; not to mention the potential implications of a scandal. To add to that, we now have paid private security and know that AURA offered to put up the 12 to 15 evacuees in hotels. The publicity stunt angle would actually be a conspiracy, implicating federal employees and AURA--that's a bit hardcore imo.
It’s an accidental breach of SIGINT security, the sensors this facility uses accidentally intercepted US military signals without knowing it and someone found out. The FBI was sent in to scrub the data and find out how it was done so either the signals or equipment can be modified.
originally posted by: riiver
originally posted by: KeithCooper
There is just no way in hell that a Sheriff would go on TV and appear like a total Andy Taylor without instruction to do so...acting as if He has no control or say or even curiosity about what is occuring in his jurisdiction..UNLESS it isnt his jurisdiction (espionage)(UFO crap) and He has been told to say nothing and appear confused..like every other principle in this saga...EVERYONE who SHOULD know a tidbit is acting like.."Oh well...it's strange isn't it..."...these people KNOW. they have just beeen instructed to say nothing yet. One of the reasons I believe it is not UFO related is because if it was, the FBI or someone would just make up[ some believable garbage for public consumption...which they haven't as yet, even under great media pressure...meaning there will probably be an announcment of what IS happening very soon.
originally posted by: that1lurker
a reply to: KeithCooper
Why do you think the Sheriff is lying? I'll have to go back in this thread and get caught up.
This is what I find most perplexing about the entire thing--that they've let the wild speculation continue all this time and even make its way into the mainstream news. I simply cannot fathom why they haven't at least put out some kind of BS story to nip the whole thing in the bud, even if the truth of what happened is something they want to keep under wraps. Of all the things that don't make sense, that's what bothers me the most. Bizarre.
A spokeswoman for the nonprofit group that runs the facility said the organization was addressing a “security issue,” but offered no additional information, other than, “I can tell you it definitely wasn’t aliens.”
House, the sheriff, said that just before 10 a.m. Sept. 6, staffers at the Sunspot facility called to report that they were “evacuating the building” and asked if deputies could assist. He said a sergeant and a deputy were dispatched and told upon arrival that the FBI had been there earlier.
He said a volunteer fire chief claimed that the FBI had told him there had been a “credible threat” but would provide no details.
That consortium, McAteer said, had ordered the site vacated, providing no other reason than a “security” issue. He said the researchers did not spot anything in the sun to necessitate them leaving, nor were they aware of any scientific reason — such as an anomaly in the data they were collecting — for doing so.
House said his deputies spotted a Black Hawk helicopter in the area around the time the building was evacuated — although he said that is not uncommon.
A public affairs officer at White Sands said there was no testing or other activity at the range that would have prompted the evacuation in Sunspot.
originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: howtonhawky
Maybe you misunderstood what the poster was implying. Here it is again...
It’s an accidental breach of SIGINT security, the sensors this facility uses accidentally intercepted US military signals without knowing it and someone found out. The FBI was sent in to scrub the data and find out how it was done so either the signals or equipment can be modified.