One Word Has People Convinced Mike Pence Wrote Anonymous New York Times Op-Ed

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: carewemust
Something's not right. A Trump "resistor" wouldn't tell the New York Times what he's up to. Not while his mission is ongoing. Can anyone be THAT stupid?

This must be a Democrat-planted FAKE story.

Trump doesn't think so. The WH staff and cabinet are in total melt down. Finger pointing and leaks are the order of the day.

Must be quite a party....

Except that's not happening, goes to show how indoctrinated the naive are 😌

You're the last person that would know and most certainly not the last anti-trumper to push BS misdirection.

3 pages of whodunit speculation and lets hang the NYT. Did it ever cross anyone's mind that maybe, just maybe, it's true? That there really are people in the administration that are legitimately concerned for the welfare of the Country and are doing what they can to 'uphold and protect the Constitution'? That Trump really is a train wreck and a danger to the Country. God knows his actions and tweets give us plenty of circumstantial evidence.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: carewemust
Something's not right. A Trump "resistor" wouldn't tell the New York Times what he's up to. Not while his mission is ongoing. Can anyone be THAT stupid?

This must be a Democrat-planted FAKE story.

Trump doesn't think so. The WH staff and cabinet are in total melt down. Finger pointing and leaks are the order of the day.

Must be quite a party....

CNN has depicted the White House staff as being in either "total meltdown", or "total chaos", for 2 years now. Meanwhile economic and world peace indicators keep going up and up.

I wouldn't bother with that user, after many failed outcomes and BS links, its no better then the silliest of users 😏

This is why the liberal media is so effective at literally brain washing naive people, they easily fall for it and eat it up, regurgitate it back here.

originally posted by: jtma508
3 pages of whodunit speculation and lets hang the NYT. Did it ever cross anyone's mind that maybe, just maybe, it's true? That there really are people in the administration that are legitimately concerned for the welfare of the Country and are doing what they can to 'uphold and protect the Constitution'? That Trump really is a train wreck and a danger to the Country. God knows his actions and tweets give us plenty of circumstantial evidence.

Did it ever cross you that these are the same liberal rags that try to smear and take down a duly elected POTUS?

Yeah, BS. Its somehow inconceivable in your eyes but not the latter, RIIIIIGHT....and how many times has the liberal media bombed and fizzled?

No, you can go ahead and think that, but you're just part of the problem.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
I doubt it is Pence. This was in the opening paragraph of the op-ed that published the letter:

a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure

1. Pence isn't an "official"; he is Vice President; and
2. The VP can't be fired, so his job would not/could not be in jeopardy.

Everyone knows it is Kelly.

Lmfao, No, just sit down.

a reply to: Arnie123

The fact that we are not at war with DPRK, not pulled out of NATO, and are still paying dues to the UN proves the stories are true. They couldn't stop him from pulling out of the TPP, but that was a politically popular, if foolish move. The economic recovery started under Obama and the stock market is overheated. Do you think Trump will take credit when it corrects itself?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: DanDanDat

This November the religous right and the far left team up to defeat trump.

The "religious right" put him in office. Divorces, grabbing women, running casinos, getting multiple divorces... none of that matters to the devout. Trump's their guy.

None of this matter while running a country.

It's better to have multiple divorces than to sell your nation to foreign powers.

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
I doubt it is Pence. This was in the opening paragraph of the op-ed that published the letter:

a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure

1. Pence isn't an "official"; he is Vice President; and
2. The VP can't be fired, so his job would not/could not be in jeopardy.

Everyone knows it is Kelly.

Lmfao, No, just sit down.

We will know for sure after the purge.

originally posted by: carewemust

Meanwhile economic and world peace indicators keep going up and up.

Care to cite this 'world peace indicator'? The Global Peace Index says exactly the opposite. And the Stock Market is not the economy.

originally posted by: vinifalou

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: DanDanDat

This November the religous right and the far left team up to defeat trump.

The "religious right" put him in office. Divorces, grabbing women, running casinos, getting multiple divorces... none of that matters to the devout. Trump's their guy.

None of this matter while running a country.

It's better to have multiple divorces than to sell your nation to foreign powers.

Wake up!

a reply to: DJW001

Oh, I am wide awake my friend. You, on the other hand are still sleeping with your comfort blanket.

vault.fbi.gov...

Your candidate sold your Uranium to The Enemy. How does that make you feel?

a reply to: DJW001

All in good time my deluded leftist friend 😏

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: DBCowboy

Look conservatives, Trump supporters, poor readers, this thread isn't about me and what I believe, although I will share my opinions, but stop thinking about me and move your attention to the story at hand.

This is a conspiracy site and this is a perfect conspiracy for today! But I get it, it bothers many people because it's not a conspiracy about Hillary, or Obama, or Democrats, or anything not related to the Dear Leader.

Ah my friend, but it is about you. It is about you and the rest of the far left continuing to divide the country by propagating the nonsense in the NYT article. You can call the other posters names all you want (after all, that is the liberal fall back tactic when they can’t debate or defend their OP); that won’t make your OPINION the correct one.

Now to the article. Even some of the left talking heads admit that a single sourced article is poor journalism at best. My best guess? NYT either wrote it themselves in an attempt to stay relevant or are in collusion with the author, again to try and stay relevant. I have no evidence, but since in America these days you don’t have to actually prove collusion to verify it, I figured why not throw it out there. Heck, Woodward could be colluding with NYT to sell more books (since it seems the essay tries so hard to support allegations in his newly released book of innuendo).

It is really a shame the left and it’s supporteres are so desperate to see America fail when it’s finally moving in the right direction on so many fronts - economy soaring, curtailing industry destroying over-regulation, tremendous steps toward world nuclear weapon controls, engaging the leaders of the countries that are the biggest threats to US security, and building a SCOTUS that will actually uphold the US Constitution as written. Almost forgot, lowest unemployment EVER in some categories.

While there are long ways to go in other areas, it would seem hard to hate, as the left does, those successes outlined above. But what you gonna do...haters gonna hate! The left has more than proven they have perfected the demonstration of that emotion.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
I doubt it is Pence. This was in the opening paragraph of the op-ed that published the letter:

a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure

1. Pence isn't an "official"; he is Vice President; and
2. The VP can't be fired, so his job would not/could not be in jeopardy.

Everyone knows it is Kelly.

Lmfao, No, just sit down.

We will know for sure after the purge.

No doubt, but you leftist always embeliish events, common fallace among the journalistic naive 😌

originally posted by: jtma508

originally posted by: carewemust

Meanwhile economic and world peace indicators keep going up and up.

Care to cite this 'world peace indicator'? The Global Peace Index says exactly the opposite. And the Stock Market is not the economy.

Lmfao, yeah and indexes said Hillary would have won, there's no such thing as a global peace index other then putting your mind at ease.

Lol, childish.

a reply to: Swills

I don't know who wrote this article, but I love this line from it:

This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.

a reply to: vinifalou

Don't bother, it'll spin it and run in circles to try and confuse you, meanwhile, you're standing there watching all this go down, rather comical.

They dom't care if it aids the enemy, leftist are globalist, therefore, they're doing them a favor, lmfao.

a reply to: Lab4Us

Well said and exactly what needed to be said.

a reply to: Arnie123

Oh I don't allow myself to get bothered anymore.

I just like pointing out how wrong they are, because even that they will never admit it, they'll put their heads on the pillow thinking of how mislead they were by their so-called Leaders.

I don't want their acceptance that I'm right. I just want to plant a seed on their way of thinking.

a reply to: Lab4Us

Lol. You should actually read the Op-Ed first before moving to kneejerk deflect mode. I'm going to post some excerpts from what was said:

To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.

But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.

Does that sound like someone who hates the President and wants him to fail?