Infowars.com Site Goes Down Amid Big Tech Censorship

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: KansasGirl

OHHHHhhhhhhh, is THAT what it stands for????

Huh, I always thought it stood for Potential Murder Suspect (PMS)!!

PMS is that arty television station that does telethons and documentaries.

a reply to: Nyiah

Never heard of a hot spare?

Interesting.

Do you understand how Cloudflare services work?

I'd like to help you understand, that what you are describing as "directed intention", can actually be an automatic fail safe.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Nyiah


As a woman can you tell me if the site is back up while making me a sandwich?

Sure thing, sweet cheeks, but DB came strutting in in his glorious pink heels and ate all the fixin's. Besides, I need to restock the rat poi--I mean, other condiments, anyway.

originally posted by: redletter

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: redletter

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: redletter
a reply to: Nyiah

For the 2nd time I will chime in. I checked in infowars.com is up and running. Get down off of your persecution SJW complex.

That still doesn't explain the links to his other crap when the site was supposed to be shut down. Nobody's bothered to explain s# regarding that Captain Obvious gem.

I'll give you slack on that because I know you are a woman. And maybe on your period. You act without rationality

You men can't even get that right.

It's the week BEFORE our periods when we react irrationally. PMS stands for PRE-menstrual syndrome. It's the week before our periods that our hormones make us intolerant of bullsnip that we are tolerant of the other three weeks of the month.

By the time we are ON our periods, hormones are back to normal and we are able to put up with you again without voicing your failings out loud.

Thanks for reminding me of that. I know it is true. Because, trust me I live with women. When they get on their period you're right, they can be downright sweet and all the sudden want to copulate, which would be wrong. I accept your reprimand.

In return I will say that as much wrong as we guys are, the women are wrong just as much. I know this from life experience. But it makes it a lot nicer to have a good woman who is wrong to live with a man who is wrong, and they both get along and love each other and realize it.

Oh good lord.

You don't have to like Mr. Jones....but you should be very concerned at what is taking place.
There are those that are dismissing the bans as being "normal activity for violating T &C" well that's just BS.
This is targeted at Jones because he stopped distracting people with silly conspiracy stories that can easily be dismissed by the mainstream, and began to focus on political situations in the US and Europe with regard to immigration.
Talking about immigration has been deemed to be a "violation of T &C".....
Its been deemed to be "inciting violence"
BULL
Its been deemed to be something the media does not want talked about is what has happened.

These sites present themselves as open and even platforms for communication. Then they act like a private business when they want to silence someone they disagree with.
Well you cant have it both ways
Either you are an open content neutral platform, or you are not.
I am very pro business and I have no issue with a business controlling the content of their site, however I do have an issue with a business presenting itself as one thing but conducting itself as another. In this case the businesses are acting as an arm of the Shadow government.
This not a violation of the first amendment, but it is mob action and a coordinated attack on someone that is "fringe" in an effort to establish the meme and make a test case.
If this happens without significant blowback then you will see more and more of it.

Now ask yourself.
Is this being done so as to encourage the demand for government action? To take the load off of these corporate entities and make their quasi government affiliation official?
They are acting in a manner that seems to indicate that they are secretly wanting government legislation to control the platforms for communication. They WANT to de-mask people on the internet and require positive identification. They WANT government enforcement of content.
So that they don't have to do it...
So that they are shielded from lawsuits when they are forced to provide information in legal cases
So that they are shielded from the fallout of being a direct conduit to intelligence agencies.

It;s just a conspiracy theory - nothing to worry about. Youtube, Facebook, Google, Mastercard and other big companies are not doing every thing they can to shut down conservative and non-liberal views. They will just disappear but don't worry, it's just a conspiracy theory.

They are desperate, so desperate that they are willing to go for broke and destroy freedom of speech. If we allow it I suppose we get what we deserve.

Well, he's back up with a lot of histrionics on the front page of Infowars...

....and an appeal for money.

Now... I've seen this trick with other websites. Not saying that Jones did it, but sites have gone "offline" before and then announced an "attack" and started begging for money -- a true "false flag" there.

So is the Jones "OMG! WEBSITE DOWN! UNDER ATTACK!" one of those? He's known for making outrageous claims that he had to walk back.

BTW, the removal from services was for violation of their published guidelines. It's not a "first amendment" issue...because those sites aren't a government. Private sites can set rules and kick people off for violations.

originally posted by: Byrd
Now... I've seen this trick with other websites. Not saying that Jones did it

I will.

While his website was down, pings were resolving fairly quickly from across the globe. He did not get attacked. He took his own website down, but the servers were still answering.

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: Byrd
Now... I've seen this trick with other websites. Not saying that Jones did it

I will.

While his website was down, pings were resolving fairly quickly from across the globe. He did not get attacked. He took his own website down, but the servers were still answering.

I'm not terribly surprised. The "victim" card can be a powerful one.

a reply to: Konduit

McInnes wasn't censored he broke conmunity standards and probably hate speech laws. Hes also a racist and has used all of the most terrible racial slurs multiple times.

The Tech giants are playing a game of chess with unsuspecting people by removing him from Facebook and all other platforms these companies are driving traffic to his downloadable App on both Android and Apple. Why not censor his app? Because this allows big tech and the government to monitor political dissidents by tracking the activity of the people who download the application to their phones. Alex Jones knows about this but probably feels his message and his bank account are more important than funneling people into censorship monitoring factories. If these tech giants really were afraid of Jones they would ban his apps off the marketplace but instead they have now an engorged registry of potential political dissidents