It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Glacial erratics can be very large.
In my opinion from research I did at the time that is what the Baltic Anomaly is , but it could have another natural explanation.
Geographers will recognise the Great Stone of Fourstones as a glacial erratic – a piece of stone transported from far away by a glacier and left behind when the ice retreated 10,000 or more years ago. During the course of its journey it has been tumbled, or maybe it was pushed by earth’s great forces before breaking off and enduring its icy piggy-back: I don’t know; anyway, the strata in the rock are about 90 degrees off horizontal.
bitaboutbritain.com...
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: one4all
Maybe , but not this one.
Geographers will recognise the Great Stone of Fourstones as a glacial erratic – a piece of stone transported from far away by a glacier and left behind when the ice retreated 10,000 or more years ago. During the course of its journey it has been tumbled, or maybe it was pushed by earth’s great forces before breaking off and enduring its icy piggy-back: I don’t know; anyway, the strata in the rock are about 90 degrees off horizontal.
bitaboutbritain.com...
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: one4all
Maybe , but not this one.
Geographers will recognise the Great Stone of Fourstones as a glacial erratic – a piece of stone transported from far away by a glacier and left behind when the ice retreated 10,000 or more years ago. During the course of its journey it has been tumbled, or maybe it was pushed by earth’s great forces before breaking off and enduring its icy piggy-back: I don’t know; anyway, the strata in the rock are about 90 degrees off horizontal.
bitaboutbritain.com...
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: one4all
Now THAT is much more imagined and inaccurate.....even sounds sillier to the ear.
Two can play that game.
originally posted by: wtfatta
The "impact trench" is in quotes because I have no direct evidence as yet that it is a deformation caused by an impact, but impact trench is how it's often referred to, so I went with the most commonly known attributable name to describe the feature I'm most interested in. To that end, this is part of what I'm trying to determine:
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: wtfatta
how long is the alledged impact trench [ that determines approach angle ?
impact energy estimates ?
I have an hypothesis that the Baltic Sea anomaly is ejecta from a supervolcano, and if I can determine the approach angle, I have a starting point and a rough area that may have to account for the coriolis effect. From there I also need to determine the force necessary to project a 35 kiloton rock X kilometers away. I assume the force necessary would be monstrous and if it exceeds any known volcanic eruptive force, I must conclude it's not likely a result of a volcano; however, if it falls within an acceptable range and within X distance from a known supervolcano, the likelihood increases that it's simply ejecta of various forms of rock.
The Baltic Sea Anomaly is still a bit of a disputed mystery as some places claim it's a natural formation while others claim it's part of a UFO that crashed.
originally posted by: Flanker86
The anomaly there isn't at sea ... is in the Nazi occupied baltic republics that under their highest state institutional instructions are following to the letter, the Eugenics directives as described by Jozef Mengele, to torture children and conduct eugenics experiments in genetic manipulation against them, in an attempt to manufacture "Das Uebermensch" , which according to Mengele's followers is a superior hybrid Islamist-African master race meant to fight against the Russians.