Former FBI Attorney LISA PAGE is Spilling The Beans and Coming Clean.

a reply to: shooterbrody

"Spying" is not an attack. That is an important distinction in the new world of cyber warfare. When YouTube sells your browsing data to an ad agency, is that an attack? No, it is "audience research," a polite term for non-governmental espionage.

a reply to: DJW001

You give YouTube permission. Not the same.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DJW001

You give YouTube permission. Not the same.

Most people don't realize they are giving that permission. In that sense, it is no different than a phishing scam.

a reply to: DJW001

"Spying" is not an attack. That is an important distinction in the new world of cyber warfare. When YouTube sells your browsing data to an ad agency, is that an attack? No, it is "audience research," a polite term for non-governmental espionage.

Are there no lengths your jackassery will seek in order to justify your less than educated opinion?
I am almost surprised you didnt attempt to frame it as an online survey.
Why the love for the chinese?

oh and perhaps you should look here
www.abovetopsecret.com...
or do you only trust the fbi when comey was using it to bludgeon his political opposition?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shooterbrody

"Spying" is not an attack. That is an important distinction in the new world of cyber warfare. When YouTube sells your browsing data to an ad agency, is that an attack? No, it is "audience research," a polite term for non-governmental espionage.

Good one. So maybe the US just didn't read the terms and conditions when it ticked that box?

Nice try.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DJW001

You give YouTube permission. Not the same.

Most people don't realize they are giving that permission. In that sense, it is no different than a phishing scam.

Absolutely 100% incorrect. You are entering into a contract and are given a full set of conditions on which it is based. Just because someone is too lazy to read it, doesn't mean they've been phished.

Jesus H Christ, these arguments being put forward...

a reply to: DJW001

What they realize is irrelevant. They give permission.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: carewemust

Of course China hacks everybody. They have not yet weaponized it like Russia did.

So that is the new spin......everybody does it, but Russia weaponized it.

That is absolutely not what I said. The United States was the first to weaponize the internet with "Olympic Games." North Korea attacked Sony, an American proxy. Russia has attacked the United States several times. China has gathered intelligence but, as far as we know, not actually attacked us. So the new spin is "if China can do it, Russia did not?"

dailycaller.com...

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shooterbrody

"Spying" is not an attack. That is an important distinction in the new world of cyber warfare. When YouTube sells your browsing data to an ad agency, is that an attack? No, it is "audience research," a polite term for non-governmental espionage.

Tell that to Pollard, the Rosenbergs, Ames, etc....
Spying is an attack and is considered as such by most Intel agencies and legal systems around the planet.

Comparison with YouTube is nonsensical - when you accept their terms and conditions, you contractually accept them selling your data.

Lisa Page testified that Hillary Clintons blackberry's were hacked by China and not Russia. She also testified that Obama was involved in all of this and was running the show.

Once again Obama is caught in a lie.