Sarah Sanders and Raj Shah planning to depart the White House

originally posted by: howtonhawky

Personally i do not buy her answer in the form of a question.

So they can just report anything they want I guess. Even if there's no evidence and the subject of the report denies it, it's still true?

And people wonder why the "free press" keeps getting attacked.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: howtonhawky

Personally i do not buy her answer in the form of a question.

So they can just report anything they want I guess. Even if there's no evidence and the subject of the report denies it, it's still true?

And people wonder why the "free press" keeps getting attacked.

perhaps take the rest of my post into context

i did not say any of the crap you just tried to put in my mouth

i suggested that perhaps her comms are tapped and that the leak came before she told everyone

many of the leaks have been some truth

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: howtonhawky

Personally i do not buy her answer in the form of a question.

So they can just report anything they want I guess. Even if there's no evidence and the subject of the report denies it, it's still true?

And people wonder why the "free press" keeps getting attacked.

perhaps take the rest of my post into context

i did not say any of the crap you just tried to put in my mouth

i suggested that perhaps her comms are tapped and that the leak came before she told everyone

many of the leaks have been some truth

So in other words you don't believe her, you believe the media, despite zero evidence of the media's claim and her denial of the report?

How did I take you out of context?

a reply to: face23785

ok i will try again

we can assume that if they made it up then they will be held accountable...

givin that the only likely scenario is that they were fed info either as cointellop of as a genuine leek coming from wires being tapped. either way they did not make it up

her answering a question with a question kinda points to cointellop and added to trumps timing with his comment of fake news i do not buy any of it

deception rules the day

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: face23785

ok i will try again

we can assume that if they made it up then they will be held accountable...

givin that the only likely scenario is that they were fed info either as cointellop of as a genuine leek coming from wires being tapped. either way they did not make it up

her answering a question with a question kinda points to cointellop and added to trumps timing with his comment of fake news i do not buy any of it

deception rules the day

Why would we assume they'll be held accountable? They haven't been held accountable for most of this. No matter how you spin it, you're saying you believe the media over her. Your explanation is fairly convoluted, and while it's possible, the simplest explanation is most often the correct one. Here's a simpler explanation:

The media hates Trump. The media has given up any pretense of even attempting to cover Trump fairly. When they hear a rumor, their decision about whether to publish goes like this:

1. Do we want this to be true?
2. If yes, publish.
3. Is additional research and verification needed? Should we ask the people involved for comment?
4. No. We want it to be true. That's good enough. Publish.
5. Whine about freedom of the press when we get called fake news for reporting a fake story that a high school newspaper would've known didn't meet any standards for publication.

a reply to: dasman888

Old intel trick.

Every dossier had a
specific typo.

Saavy?

a reply to: Agit8dChop

correct