Bush and Hitler

As you all kno america is at war with iraq,the thing is,why?President bush GUESSED(had no proof,just thought this up) that saddam had weapons of mass destruction.Ok,maybe saddam did,we have no proof that he did tho,so bush went and INVADED iraq.Since then america is in 600 trillion dollars in debt becus bush sends the tax money for soldiers and such.Now the iraqis are pissed,americans are sent in and are destroyin their country becus bush thought saddam had weapons of mass destruction.The iraqis are plannin to target american civilians,they are goin to lead a troop of kamikazi pilots.and these pilots target isnt bush,not yet at least,their targets are the americans.Does this remind you of an austrian man named Adolf Hitler?At first he was for his people,but becus of his ego,he went and invaded country after country...strangely similar with bush,says hes for his people but instead he goes and invades a country,and plans on doin so to 2 other countries.Becus Hitler underestimated the Russians and had americans comin out from the other side his ego got him killed.Bush is a war power machine,he craves devastation,and becus of this we are already losin tons of money,and are about to get killed by a group of kamikazi pilots.If we kept Clinton there would not be ONE starvin person in america,think about it,Clinton didnt cause us to go and die cus he wanted to start a war.

You're right, Clinton didn't want us to start a war except for when he was able to use one to distract us from a dress.

To say the Iraqis hate us is simple foolish and willing ignorance:

desert-smink.blogspot.com...
www.friendsofdemocracy.net...

We aren't hated no matter what Ted Kennedy tells you. Yeah, we haven't found the WMDs, but it wasn't Bush who did all the research and decided on his own to attack. Come on, there are many other people in the government and there's checks and balances. George Bush does not control this country like a puppet on a string. If you believe he does, you don't understand what a democratic republic is.

Originally posted by junglejake
You're right, Clinton didn't want us to start a war except for when he was able to use one to distract us from a dress.

To say the Iraqis hate us is simple foolish and willing ignorance:

desert-smink.blogspot.com...
www.friendsofdemocracy.net...

We aren't hated no matter what Ted Kennedy tells you. Yeah, we haven't found the WMDs, but it wasn't Bush who did all the research and decided on his own to attack. Come on, there are many other people in the government and there's checks and balances. George Bush does not control this country like a puppet on a string. If you believe he does, you don't understand what a democratic republic is.

ok,but if you read this book about the topic that ive stated (im not sure what the name is,ill get back to you when i find out) that we are in danger of gettin ourselves killed,which is responsible of george w bush

Sorry-

you will soon learn that these people here welcome the mayhem.

These people arent interested in peace, the constitution or being saved.

Good luck,

Originally posted by Dr Sick
.Since then america is in 600 trillion dollars in debt becus bush sends the tax money for soldiers and such.


.If we kept Clinton there would not be ONE starvin person in america,think about it,Clinton didnt cause us to go and die cus he wanted to start a war.

First you better check your numbers again "600 trillion" in debt Where do people get these numbers do they just make them up.

If you really think if keep Clinton there wouldnt be One starvin person in the US Man I knew he was the Dems. Golden Boy but come on.

And for Clinton not sending us to war Tell that to the people in Kosovo he was bombing the crap out of. He also shot a bunch of missiles at other countries if I remember correct.

[edit on 19-2-2005 by ShadowXIX]

First I assure you all Bush is the last president of U.S.A. U.S.A. is going to strat WW3 when they invade Iran, The U.S. is in debt to the "Federal Reserve" which is not part of The U.S. Government look in your Phone books and you'll see it NOT under "Government Agency" but "PRIVATE Corp"

[edit on 19-2-2005 by SiberianTiger]

Originally posted by Dr Sick
As you all kno america is at war with iraq,the thing is,why?President bush GUESSED(had no proof,just thought this up) that saddam had weapons of mass destruction.Ok,maybe saddam did,we have no proof that he did tho,so bush went and INVADED iraq.

Dr. Sick, suppose for an instant that no weapons of mass destruction ever turn up in Iraq. What would that imply? If no WMD's in Iraq is true, then Blair and Bush are at the heart of an enormous conspiracy, involving dozens of current and former officials and institutions — including President Clinton, French, Russian and German leaders and intelligence services, UN inspectors and the UN itself. We know terrorism's goal is to weaken the enemy in any way possible, even at the expense of oneself, Saddam is perhaps the ultimate terrorist, and it's a good thing he's gone.

We know that Iraq had at least 1.77 tons of low enriched uranium because we have it stored in Tennessee.

tennessean.com...

The IAEA found five pounds of radioactive uranium oxide (yellowcake) in a shipment of scrap metal at Rotterdam harbor. The metal came from Iraq via a dealer in Jordan.

www.usatoday.com...

In a letter from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei to the UN Security Council. ElBaradei wrote that commercial satellite imagery revealed “extensive removal of equipment and, in some instances…entire buildings” from Iraqi nuclear facilities.

www.armscontrol.org...

In October 2003, retired Air Force Lt. Gen. James Clapper, head of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, revealed that vehicle traffic photographed by U.S. spy satellites indicated that material and documents related to Saddam's forbidden WMD programs had been shipped to Syria before the war.

www.insightmag.com...

Sick, old friend, just what do WMD's look like? Did you expect us to find an Iraqi Manhatten Project? Row upon row of bombs with, "Danger - No Smoking within 50 miles of Atomic Warhead" stenciled on it? Barrels of oozing gooy like substance belived to be chemical in nature because there was no living thing within 25 miles?

www.insightmag.com...

Saddam didn't get much media coverage when he confessed to having WMD's? Dan "Faked Documents" Rather didn't do a 20/20 about it nor did little miss, "Does this dress make me look fat", Katie Couric.

www.newsmax.com...

stromata.typepad.com...

A report by Charles Duelfer makes very interesting reading for those who really want to know. For those with a closed mind, it will be a waste of time.

www.benadorassociates.com...

The media continues to insist the Bush administration's case for Iraq's WMD was seriously flawed. And the Left still claims Bush Lied! about Iraq's possession of WMD. How many finds of chemical weapons and related materials are needed to convince the media and the Left that Iraq possessed them? I expect the "Three Stoogies Of Media Bias" will be there to televise the newly elected DNC, Howard Dean, when holds a news conference and suggest the US should now surrender.

I’ll tell you one thing though. I’m sick and tired of hearin’ whiny, skinny liberals braying on like a bunch of jackasses to the moon about what we’ve been doin’ wrong since we went into IRAQ. Forget all this stuff about W.M.D.'s though. It’s not good for your precious indigestion and believe me when I tell you that you’re the only ones having any trouble sleeping at night.