This is why America needs a Monarchy

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
This is why America needs a Monarchy

All those bad lip reading vids are funny.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Only if I get to be the monarch or get to choose the monarch. (Fully automated socialist utopia, here we come! Muahahahaha!)

Op quietly sneaks back in for a looksee worried he will be guillotined.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

America already has a Monarchy.

They just decided to have a short break from it in 1776. The Royal Family are ready to resume their role whenever America wishes.

Interestingly enough countries with a monarchy are more stable then those without.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

You sir are a reasonable Muslim. If you chop my head off send me to a paradise where I have a part time wife. One a life time is enough. Who needs 72 "needy" virgins

a reply to: alldaylong

Well some suggest that the Queen owns the US, as its a registered Corporation. But thats for another thread.

a reply to: testingtesting

Interestingly thats dubious - care to count the African nations with monarchies that had uprisings?

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Wow, you really want to go there? I thought this thread would be a light-hearted jab at why a monarchy wouldn't work in the US. I figured that using myself as an example would be proof enough that we wouldn't really want it here.

I was going to comment on the other nonsense you mentioned, but it's got nothing to do with your OP. So I'm not even sure where you're going with that?

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: alldaylong

Well some suggest that the Queen owns the US, as its a registered Corporation. But thats for another thread.

See what the "B" in "BAR" stands for.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Check it out.

www.google.com...

well the amendment forbidding titles of nobility was never actually ratified yet by enough states to become law, 12 states, so it could very well happen someday despite what many fellow americans think.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

I thought the nature of the response ie marriage was light hearted.

Which particular parts of my nonsense dont you want to discuss. You yourself brought socialism a subset of political ideology into a monarchy thread. It would have been more relevant had you brought up republicanism ?

I wan't attacking Islam, forgive me if it came across that way.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

British? Am I right?

a reply to: testingtesting

Even Obama curtsied for the Queen and our Prime Ministers bow.(woof woof)

If I bend my knee to any despot whether elected or through birth, its to prepare the other foot to lash out.

a reply to: namehere

That would suggest that there were still US traitors who wore 2 hats or that the British monarchy would only tolerate so much leeway for true freedom.