Grassley rips Strzok-Page redactions amid mystery text: Obama 'White House is running this'

a reply to: whyamIhere

I've yet to meet a virtuous Lawyer.

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: whyamIhere

I've yet to meet a virtuous Lawyer.

Ummm...that's right...and that sentiment would include...both Obama's...and...both Clinton's...

Imagine that...





YouSir

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: rickymouse
Even if Obama's name is in the original, I doubt if it will matter. He can deny he authorized someone to use his name or something. Remember, both Obamas are lawyers, they know how to twist things so they can get away with something. His name could appear there if his legal team wrote it, the president doesn't usually actually write anything, well, Trump tweets he does not write. They delegate things so well paid disposable people have jobs.

The only way for Obama out of this one is to have Strzok and Page get completely thrown under the bus as scapegoats, rolled over a dozen times then empty the onboard urinals on what remains. Then they can sing like songbirds on everything they know once they get completely abandoned by the conspirators.

Bigger than Watergate on the corruption side, and potentially bigger than the OJ trial on the drama side.

All Obama needs to do is ask Page and Strozak to meet with him. Fly them over, but have the plane crash. They do that all the time. Or Seth Rich them.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: muzzelfuzz
a reply to: DBCowboy

That's the scary part...

That should tell anyone right away if this stinks of corruption.

Would any of this be out if Hillary had been elected?

Of course not.

Why?

Because it stinks of corruption!

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton didn't have an Inspector General looking over her shoulder, which is a first in the history of this country. Why do you think that was?

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: rickymouse
Even if Obama's name is in the original, I doubt if it will matter. He can deny he authorized someone to use his name or something. Remember, both Obamas are lawyers, they know how to twist things so they can get away with something. His name could appear there if his legal team wrote it, the president doesn't usually actually write anything, well, Trump tweets he does not write. They delegate things so well paid disposable people have jobs.

The only way for Obama out of this one is to have Strzok and Page get completely thrown under the bus as scapegoats, rolled over a dozen times then empty the onboard urinals on what remains. Then they can sing like songbirds on everything they know once they get completely abandoned by the conspirators.

Bigger than Watergate on the corruption side, and potentially bigger than the OJ trial on the drama side.

All Obama needs to do is ask Page and Strozak to meet with him. Fly them over, but have the plane crash. They do that all the time. Or Seth Rich them.

I read last week that a mysterious plane crash killed the lady who certified Obama's birth certificate. It was back in 2013, I believe.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: muzzelfuzz
a reply to: DBCowboy

That's the scary part...

That should tell anyone right away if this stinks of corruption.

Would any of this be out if Hillary had been elected?

Of course not.

Why?

Because it stinks of corruption!

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton didn't have an Inspector General looking over her shoulder, which is a first in the history of this country. Why do you think that was?

Obama and Hillary didn't want the oversight, probably for the Iranian bribes.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: muzzelfuzz
a reply to: DBCowboy

That's the scary part...

That should tell anyone right away if this stinks of corruption.

Would any of this be out if Hillary had been elected?

Of course not.

Why?

Because it stinks of corruption!

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton didn't have an Inspector General looking over her shoulder, which is a first in the history of this country. Why do you think that was?

Obama and Hillary didn't want the oversight, probably for the Iranian bribes.

Looks like it was for everything that we're finding out about now.

But we should leave them alone...

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: muzzelfuzz
a reply to: DBCowboy

That's the scary part...

That should tell anyone right away if this stinks of corruption.

Would any of this be out if Hillary had been elected?

Of course not.

Why?

Because it stinks of corruption!

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton didn't have an Inspector General looking over her shoulder, which is a first in the history of this country. Why do you think that was?

No one dared?

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Waiting to see the talking points from our friends who believe the latest MSM spin...seems to be crickets!?

Of course we know the Intel community are liars when the say things need to be unreleased, or redacted for "national security" reasons.

We see this over and over.

remember how the Nunes memo was going to crush national security?

And now we see things like the price of of a tabe had to be redacted for "national security"

Its a joke. It as laughable as them claiming that spying on trump was for his own "protection" or that if they have to follow the legal congressional oversight, it is a treasonous abuse of power.

The truth is the intel community knows that if the people get to see what they have been up to, they will be furious. SO there only hope is to refuse any transparency, and to lie and threaten anyone who seeks to shine light on this.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: muzzelfuzz
a reply to: DBCowboy

That's the scary part...

That should tell anyone right away if this stinks of corruption.

Would any of this be out if Hillary had been elected?

Of course not.

Why?

Because it stinks of corruption!

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton didn't have an Inspector General looking over her shoulder, which is a first in the history of this country. Why do you think that was?

No one dared?

The Obama administration DOJ made sure he didn't have power to do so.

originally posted by: Grambler
Of course we know the Intel community are liars when the say things need to be unreleased, or redacted for "national security" reasons.

We see this over and over.

remember how the Nunes memo was going to crush national security?

And now we see things like the price of of a tabe had to be redacted for "national security"

Its a joke. It as laughable as them claiming that spying on trump was for his own "protection" or that if they have to follow the legal congressional oversight, it is a treasonous abuse of power.

The truth is the intel community knows that if the people get to see what they have been up to, they will be furious. SO there only hope is to refuse any transparency, and to lie and threaten anyone who seeks to shine light on this.

Makes one wonder how much agenda was injected into daily briefings to a POTUS who would rather be golfing than working......one who was famously known for his empty chair as a US Senator.......could be enough to run a war in say....Syria for example.

a reply to: carewemust

As mentioned in an another thread him and Clinton started visiting Aust & NZ a few months ago
Probably calling in favours for a safe retreat down under. Extradition not available for non serious crimes. So they may skate

a reply to: elementalgrove

That's because when the real truth comes out there won't be a democratic party anymore they will all be in jail. And the lefties finally know the date were playing checkers Trump is playing 9th demensional chess.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

who gives a worry

Anyone remember VALERIE JARRETT? It's appearing as if she was the BRAINS behind SpyGate. Obama merely signed off on it, at Valerie's recommendation, according to:

SOURCE: www.americanthinker.com...

12/18/2018

Office of Inspector General's Report on recovering deleted Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text messages.

Overview: oig.justice.gov...

Summary: The OIG forensically recovered thousands of text messages from FBI mobile devices issued to Strzok and Page through its multiple extraction efforts.

Approximately 9,311 text messages were recovered from Strzok's S5 during the collection tool failure period.

Approximately I0,760 text messages were recovered from Page's S5 during the collection tool failure period.

The OIG's forensic recovery efforts also identified additional relevant text messages from outside the collection tool failure period.

Full Report (16 Pages): www.oversight.gov...