It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: notsure1
Nothing says totalitarian like forcing people to stand for a worthless spectacle
if this is Trump winning, it says a lot how people think
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
Nope, not enough. The boycott continues. EVERY player should be on the field, standing, respecting the flag during the anthem. I've not watched a game in nearly 2 years and this virtual platitude by the NFL means nothing.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: intrepid
Isn't it sad that the NFL feels the need to explain themselves or placate to ultra-nationalists?
Respecting the flag and the national anthem is "ultra-nationalist".
Hmm, who'd have thought...
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: American-philosopher
They have every right to protest, even if their rules are against it. Sure there may be repercussions, but that's the choice they make when protesting. Some of the repercussions are that fans chose not to participate anymore. That effected the bottom line, and enacted the change we see here today.
so everyone is still free to do anything they like. Fans are free to not watch, players are free to break their leagues rules.
No they're not. They do not have every right to protest. Never have. Never will.
What part of the 'Gov't shall not infringe' do you not understand?? Rather simple.
I think the first amendment covers that.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: TinySickTears
Who is being forced to do anything?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: TinySickTears
Not forced patriotism, forced acknowledgement of the fact that they are there because of the fans and, as a result, they are expected to do what the fans expect them to do.
EVERY player should be on the field, standing, respecting the flag during the anthem
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: redmage
originally posted by: network dude
It's sad that you would say silly things like that, then act as if he's not intelligent in the same sentence. Kind of shows a lack of intellect.
He didn't need to be president to attack the NFL, but having such support certainly didn't hurt. Correlation is not causation, and his lack of emotional maturity has nothing to do with his intelligence. There's a reason EQ an IQ are different concepts. Your straw man arguments kinda show a lack of intellect when it comes to constructing logical arguments.
I am confused now. Was Trump smart for enacting change in the NFL with just one sentence, or was he dumb for being able to enact change in the NFL with just one sentence?
Why should anyone have to choose? He's duart... or would it be smumb?
Seriously, in this regard I think Trump caught an updraft and rode it for awhile. Not saying he didn't 100% believe in the message he stated on the topic, but I think he's one of those "finger on the pulse of populist opinion" wizzes who realized the kneeling issue was about to boil over and the league was about to see a measurable number of fans say "we've had enough of your BS, millionares who's only reason for being on TV is your ability to catch, throw, run, or hit" and he roped that storm. Personally speaking, I stopped watching middle of the prior season and Kapernick's sideline act was only a piece of why... the league isn't fun anymore, Goodell sucks, the rule changes suck, etc. I probably won't watch again until Goodell is gone, and even then maybe not.