It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He’ll probably rant on again about how “accurate” he is.
“Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I suffer you?"
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: The angel of light
“Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I suffer you?"
Just to show people, the above isn’t in any of the bibles. It’s a mishmash of different verses. So it looks like the OP is now trying to write his own bible.
specially when I point correctly to an incoming event that actually happen
Are you shocked that i said for days and days that Eagles were going to win the super bowl while you and your friends perhaps were betting money to the opponents?
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: watchitburn
You are completely wrong the great flood actually happen in Turkey, a portal collapsed where now is the Bosphorus straight, by the very beginning of Civilization.
Millions of tons of water from the Marmara sea fell toward the basin of the Black sea, that was not a giant lake as it is now, it was a large fertil plane where thousands of people lived in towns and small cities.
This happened about 4000 years before Christ, it was absolutely proven by Archaeologists and Geologists working in late 1990s.
That disaster was the base of the Gilgamesh Summerian legend that inspired the Noah story in the Bible.
The Angel of Lightness
In order to produce a Black Sea flooding such as the one described by Ryan and Pitman a solid obstruction of the Turkish Straits should have occurred. It must have had a significant height to allow for a rise on the south side, while to the north the water level should have been dropping. A notable point here is that the low lands in the Black Sea's basin would have already been flooded.
In this alternative scenario much depends on the evolution of the Bosphorus. According to a study from 2001 the modern sill is 32–34 m (105–112 ft) below sea level, and consists of Quaternary sand over-lying Paleozoic bedrock in which three sills are found at 80–85 m (260–280 ft) below sea level. Sedimentation on these sills started before 10,000 years ago and continued until 5,300 years ago.[17]
A large part of the academic geological community also continues to reject the idea that there could have been enough sustained long-term pressure by water from the Aegean to dig through a supposed isthmus at the present Bosphorus or enough of a difference in water levels (if at all) between the two water basins.[18]
In 2007, a research anthology on the topic was published which makes much of the earlier Russian research available in English for the first time and combines it with more recent scientific findings.[19]
According to a 2009 study by Liviu Giosan, Florin Filip, and Stefan Constatinescu,[20] the level in the Black Sea before the marine reconnection was 30 m (100 ft) below present sea level, rather than the 80 m (260 ft), or lower, of the catastrophe theories. If the flood occurred at all, the sea level increase and the flooded area during the reconnection were significantly smaller than previously proposed. It also occurred earlier than initially surmised, c. 7400 BC, rather than the originally proposed 5600 BC. Since the depth of the Bosphorus, in its middle furrow, at present varies from 36 to 124 m (118 to 407 ft), with an average depth of 65 m (213 ft), a calculated stone age shoreline in the Black Sea lying 30 m (100 ft) lower than in the present day would imply that the contact with the Mediterranean may never have been broken during the Holocene, and hence there could have been no sudden waterfall-style transgression.[20]
A February 2009 article reported that the flooding might have been "quite mild".[21]
A 2012 study based on process length variation of the dinoflagellate cyst Lingulodinium machaerophorum shows no evidence for catastrophic flooding.[22]
A 2016 study reviewed the evidence accumulated and reaffirmed the catastrophic scenario (Project: DO02-337 "Ancient coastlines of the Black Sea and conditions for human presence", sponsored by Bulgarian Scientific Fund).[23]
originally posted by: Argyll
a reply to: The angel of light
Are you shocked that i said for days and days that Eagles were going to win the super bowl while you and your friends perhaps were betting money to the opponents?
You predicted the result of a 50/50 sporting event!
That does'nt make you an all knowing seer! it makes you a punter, like all your predictions you weigh up the odds and you take a punt.
It's funny how you didn't link to the articles about the damm in Columbia in your initial OP, rather you blathered on about dreams and uneasy feelings.
You have been weighed, you have been measured.......and you have been found wanting.
originally posted by: Argyll
a reply to: The angel of light
Are you shocked that i said for days and days that Eagles were going to win the super bowl while you and your friends perhaps were betting money to the opponents?
You predicted the result of a 50/50 sporting event!
That does'nt make you an all knowing seer! it makes you a punter, like all your predictions you weigh up the odds and you take a punt.
It's funny how you didn't link to the articles about the damm in Columbia in your initial OP, rather you blathered on about dreams and uneasy feelings.
You have been weighed, you have been measured.......and you have been found wanting.