-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -s3V3n-

Why don't they simply do DNA tests to determine if parent(s)/children are really parent(s) and children ?

You know, the "Science" 😎

a reply to: dntwastetime

Yep it's awfully quiet on the AM and KR front. Weinstein is now the focus but he is a lot longer in this business then AM. He certainly has a lot to offer to reduce his sentence by a sizeable amount. Could be interesting to monitor which celebrity suddenly decides to take a "vacation" outside the US next. I'm following the blind items from CDAN and some of them paint a very vivid but sinister picture lately. Especially that Weinstein supposedly "helped" Meghan Markle in advancing her career and that she paid someone $250k to stay quiet. I still think that taking down NXIVM and Weinstein are the snowball that turns soon into a D5 and burries them all. These selfrighteous f#ckers deserve to go down in flames. The farce about the Oscars and #metoo was all the proof i needed.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: dntwastetime

Want to pick your brain a bit.

I agree that 'never telegraph your move to your enemey' is one of the guiding principles of Q group and thus the Plan is already a done deal. That being said, we know how cornered animals behave.

What sorts of last ditch efforts do you think we might see in response to the furtherance of the Plan?

The latest Ebola outbreak looks very convenient and timed. It could also have something to do with the BS Catch and Release related to MS-13 thugs. What if they can be used to infect the whole US? One state of a time.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical
They have no comms left . They are done. Only NOV election threatens us. My computer and internet are being attacked now so I better go for awhile. Re read the drops ATS you have it all from what I can see. Q posted a pic from inside Pope's photo gallery of the "secure phone' They got in dec. Probably the first text test photo he sent to the cabal thinking he was outsmarting Q . Since then Q has listened to every second of the cabals comms. Good luck ATS.

a reply to: dntwastetime

Godspeed Anon. WWG1WGA.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: fiverx313

You seriously bring up 1500 children against 800k missing children and counting every year just to paint Trump as a racist? Get lost and

for once. You clearly don't know anything about this topic.

As far as I've learned and read they're working hard to prevent it from happening any more, and that what was happening wasn't due to Turmp policies but the past administration when one looks more closely at the dates and the people involved.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

you've definitely found some more relevant articles, but i still feel that 120 of 506 MS-13 suspects having arrives as UACs still doesn't back up the claim that most/many UACs are MS-13 gang members trying to slip into the country.

i'm troubled that the dept of HHS has placed so many UACs with so little oversight that they've lost 1500 of them. you may feel better about it by saying that they're all just gang members or, as another poster said, that it's their family's fault anyway... but that doesn't really make me feel any better about it.

yes, lots of children go missing every year, as another poster pointed out -- but i think in situations where we can attribute large chunks of that to systemic causes and policies, those should be addressed.

originally posted by: Elostone
Don't put words in my mouth.
I never said most, I said many.
When you make an obvious troll post, it's...well, obvious

somehow, i had a feeling that you would use that as a dodge. it was unintentional on my part, and i don't believe the semantic difference between your 'many' and my 'most' is so great as to give you an out from answering the damn question.

if you disagree, feel free to explain the difference and how that excuses you from caring...

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
As far as I've learned and read they're working hard to prevent it from happening any more, and that what was happening wasn't due to Turmp policies but the past administration when one looks more closely at the dates and the people involved.

you are correct that this wasn't due to trump's new policy. i'm saying that trump's new policy will aggravate it.

hopefully they're really working hard to prevent it from happening again, but i fail to see how separating the children from their families is a benefit to the children.

a reply to: fiverx313

Read the article i posted. This has nothing to do with Trump. You're spreading Fake News and you don't even make any attempts to correct your mistake. That proves that you used this BS to attack Trump and just pretended to care about the missing children.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: fiverx313

Read the article i posted. This has nothing to do with Trump. You're spreading Fake News and you don't even make any attempts to correct your mistake. That proves that you used this BS to attack Trump and just pretended to care about the missing children.

it has to do with immigration policy. trump is setting policy. i did not make a mistake, and i'm not really motivated to read your articles considering that you've been haranguing me right out of the gate and putting words in my mouth.

you ain't proved #. don't tell me what i care about, honey. you don't know me.

a reply to: Trillium

I know that's Trump, but I still can't figure out that plate?

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
My question, and I posted it on the thread,is if that is the case why get all these people rilled up and for what purpose?

It has always been about hearts and minds, what isn't known is who is doing the winning over.

Not delivering the goods is going to leave a mighty big patrotic bunch in the lurch.

Doesn't matter. They will have vented and be spent. The only ones willing to go out and act will be used as the reason to react.

I am happy to follow along, we have had some amazing results so far!

That is what they were counting on.

originally posted by: 0bserver1
I know that's Trump, but I still can't figure out that plate?

4 10 20 = DJT

Someone shopped an old pic and changed DJT on the vanity plates to 4 10 20.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

I was just getting ready to reply to his/her post but wanted to make sure nothing I add had already been posted.

Fiverx: Now not only did it fall at BO's doorstep but they basically allowed it to continue because of well you know...money.

There was a whistleblower who came forward and provided spreadsheets showing 1,000's of children unaccompanied were being placed with criminals. As I said earlier nobody cared because GS15 and SES would not get their big fat bonuses.




link

But wait there is more.

This whistleblower was mad as hell and persistent also because her spreadsheet/report was buried by DHS and HHS.





link

Carolyn Lerner took notice of these slimey dealings. She disagreed with OIG findings and wrote this letter to the president.




link

So thanks to this whistleblower a hearing was scheduled for the end of April 2018.




link

So yes it infuriates me that this kind of thing is happening but let's try to place the blame where it belongs. And even more helpful would be to join the fight to bring down these pedos/human traffickers for the sake of saving these innocent children. This issues doesn't have a side except a human side. So please pass the word around to everyone you know that a huge injustice is being served and the children are the ones who are paying the price.

originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: Trillium

I know that's Trump, but I still can't figure out that plate?

Several interesting things about those numbers 4-10-20 !

en.wikipedia.org...

www.biblestudytools.com...:10-20

Good Afternoon Gang Catching up, then a few thoughts to share.

a reply to: MountainLaurel

When did they make that picture?

a reply to: 0bserver1

Don't know about the shopped version but the original is supposed to be from 1973.

1973 Meet Donald Trump

a reply to: daskakik

I knew you would reply on this... !

a reply to: 0bserver1

It is my MO.

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: Elostone
Don't put words in my mouth.
I never said most, I said many.
When you make an obvious troll post, it's...well, obvious

somehow, i had a feeling that you would use that as a dodge. it was unintentional on my part, and i don't believe the semantic difference between your 'many' and my 'most' is so great as to give you an out from answering the damn question.

if you disagree, feel free to explain the difference and how that excuses you from caring...

Going to give you the benefit of the doubt that English is not your native language because many and most are not similar in meaning.

Key difference: ‘Many’ and ‘most’ are two terms that are used to denote quantity. However, the two terms differ in the manner that they can be used. Technically, "most" is more than "many." ‘Most’, on the other hand, is generally used to refer to something when it is ‘in the greatest degree" or "in the majority of instances.” Hence, it can be said, that ‘most’ should be used to refer to something only when it makes up more than half of its collective group, i.e. more than 50%.

www.differencebetween.info...
And I did answer your question with numerous sources backing up my original post.
As for what I do or don't care about, you really don't care about that, Stop with the phony concern

Not going to slide this thread any longer arguing basic language and semantics with you.