It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BotheLumberJack
Yes. 2.7 million would be "consumed" by the plant. Presumably the rest would be returned to the lake or used by the community.
I'm not sure how that would violate the Great Lakes Compact.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
On the one hand everyone cries for manufacturing jobs to be returned to their country; how else will industry work without a water supply?
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
On the one hand everyone cries for manufacturing jobs to be returned to their country; how else will industry work without a water supply?
I don't think that is the point to me anyway.
Since when did Wisconsin take ownership of the Great Lakes?
That's like saying Louisiana owns the Mississippi River!