It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: FyreByrd
Raising the basic rates will raise the prices of everything we use, it will effect the cost of any government service as the government relies on money borrowed from PRIVATE BANKS to provide those services.
No. Government debt is in the form of bonds which means they are borrowing from those who buy those bonds (you, me, and yes, banks). So guess where the interest on those bonds goes? To the bond holders (you, me, and yes, banks). But bond rates are not tied to the fed's rate so the point is moot.
Business debt is usually acquired in order to expand operations (if it is a well run business, or to meet short term cash flow requirements) so, if interest from that debt is being passed on to the consumer it is going to be quite insignificant in comparison to the capital cost. But doing so (passing interest and capital costs on to the consumer) would put a business at a competitive disadvantage. Normally it would just show as a loss in net revenue (it is also tax deductible). A business that is in good enough shape to get the loan can absorb the cost of that loan.
There. Ideas. Happy?
Before the global financial crisis, the Fed would raise the federal funds rate by selling U.S. Treasury securities in open market operations. Banks would pay for these securities by reducing their reserves, and reducing the supply of reserves would push up the price – the federal funds rate — that banks had to pay to borrow reserves. When the Fed wanted to lower rates, it would buy U.S. Treasury securities.
By law, only banks can earn the IOER on deposits at the Fed. But other financial institutions – Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, hedge funds, money market funds – can and do make short-term loans to domestic banks and U.S. branches of foreign banks, and they’re often willing to lend at an interest rate below the IOER. Without some additional steps by the Fed, this would make it hard for the Fed to control the federal funds rate and thus, influence, short-term rates throughout the economy.
Maybe. But I thought you were talking about the government taking loans from banks, not about banks buying Treasury bonds or taking out loans themselves. That's what those two external quotes are talking about so I'm not sure what point you're try to make with them.
And you may be a bit out of step with the times....
That is a logical fallacy known as an argument from ignorance but treasury bonds are not the only bonds issued by the government.
In my experience, I've only known one person who personally bought Treasury Bonds.
So bond investments are stupid. Got it. My brother might disagree with that assessment.
Each intervening 'financial organization' (between interest made) takes their 'cut' of the interest - from the FED down - and by the time it 'trickles-down' (also know as voo-doo) to an individual investor the 'interest earned' is negligible.
Yes, as I said, bond returns are not tied to the fed rate. Again, I'm not sure of your point.
The value of funds rise and fall mostly on individual stock values - not interest or dividends accrued to the fund.
The points that I was making about that statement were:
Raising the basic rates will raise the prices of everything we use, it will effect the cost of any government service as the government relies on money borrowed from PRIVATE BANKS to provide those services.