Andrew McCabe, a Target of Trump’s F.B.I. Scorn, Is Fired Over Candor Questions

originally posted by: howtonhawky

Why they sat on the recommendation for two days before acting if the violations were so egregious.

I think they were giving Andy time to come in and defend himself, right?

Two days is a very short amount of time irregardless.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle

What do you expect?

Knowing Sessions the way I do, and seeing that he is on the case now, a laundry list of charges for prosecution.

It's nice to see the old Jeff back... the little bulldog with gator teeth.

TheRedneck

If there was a laundry list of charges they wouldn't have fired him over "Lack of Candor". You should dig into what that means.

First things first, Brah.

How would it look if he could still collect his pension in prison?

Since your federal pension can be revoked for committing a crime while on the job. I would say they have nothing on him criminally.

Either you didn't read what you typed or you are delusional. I am leaning toward thinking it is the latter at the moment.

Please explain instead of insulting. They went the route they did because they dont have a criminal case against him and this was the only way to take away his pension.

The criminal case against him, and others will materialize when the IG Report is released. Then we'll see if Sessions is awake with hammer in hand.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: howtonhawky

For some reason I just have a hard time with
some one who has lied and entrapped innocent
people while letting guilty people go.

I am sure there are plenty of verses that address that too.

Picking and choosing a verse that supports your own position while being
sanctimonious reminds me of a verse about taking the beam out of your own
eye before you take the speck out of someone else's eye.

ok i can see i have poed everyone

the point of the verse was to show that the rebel rousing could be backfiring.

originally posted by: howtonhawky

the point of the verse was to show that the rebel rousing could be backfiring.

And who is Rebel Rousing?

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: howtonhawky

What date did that recommendation come

You've claim you've read the whole thread - figure it out

oh i know the answer and the question was designed to make you question why they sat on the recommendation for two days before acting if the violations were so egregious.

i did not make the claim you state just that your point was already covered.

Your question was also answered in the thread.

Let me paraphrase, 2 days delay, that is all you got? Moving from a recommendation to an action in the government in two days is moving at warp 9.

a reply to: howtonhawky

Proverbs 24:20

For there shall be no reward to the evil man; the candle of the wicked shall be put out.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: howtonhawky

That verse speaks of vengeance. I speak of justice.

Romans 12:19

Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

Who is to say He has not repaid using this investigation?

TheRedneck

23 These things also belong to the wise. It is not good to have respect of persons in judgment.

i can not say

The first step toward wisdom, is separating yourself from all forms of foolishness

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: face23785

no no you assume that

i said that they should have fullfilled the recommendation immediately if the violations were so egregious as to take away pensions. simply because of the optics

“Take away pensions just because of bad optics”

Sure am glad that you are not driving the boat.

a reply to: howtonhawky

You have not upset me at all. In the case of some, that verse is probably appropriate. I simply pointed out that I am not posting from a position of vengeance, but one of desiring justice.

I like a good scriptural battle once in a while. Keeps me sharp.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: face23785

no no you assume that

i said that they should have fullfilled the recommendation immediately if the violations were so egregious as to take away pensions. simply because of the optics

The recommendation came on Wednesday. He got fired on Friday.

I'm not assuming anything. You've been told this yet you still have to pretend the timing was political. The timing was because they just got a report saying this guy did xyz fire him. If you keep pretending otherwise you're giving away your own political bias. No assumptions needed.

originally posted by: Willtell
An absolute sinister and vindictive act to prevent the guy from getting his pension.

The purpose was to scare other FBI into behaving more loyally.

It is also an advance strike on a clear witness in Mueller's investigation. McCabe corroborating Comeys memos.

Like all Trump's stupid moves, this is going to blow up in his face.

McCabe is challenging the move in court and has lined attorney's.

It will be interesting what the WH and Sessions is required to turn over around their communications and reasoning for the firing.

originally posted by: soberbacchus
McCabe is challenging the move in court and has lined attorney's.

It will be interesting what the WH and Sessions is required to turn over around their communications and reasoning for the firing.

Did you forget to read the first page of the OP?

McCabe's firing came at the recommendation of OIPR.

"Pursuant to Department Order 1202, and based on the report of the Inspector General, the findings of the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility, and the recommendation of the Department’s senior career official, I have terminated the employment of Andrew McCabe effective immediately," Sessions said in a statement Friday night.

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Willtell
An absolute sinister and vindictive act to prevent the guy from getting his pension.

It is also an advance strike on a clear witness in Mueller's investigation. McCabe corroborating Comeys memos.

.

Please explain your theory as to why the FBI OIG and OPR would want to do this?

a reply to: soberbacchus

McCabe is challenging the move in court and has lined attorney's.

Do you have a link for that? Seems to me he has a serious uphill battle in court.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Willtell
An absolute sinister and vindictive act to prevent the guy from getting his pension.

The purpose was to scare other FBI into behaving more loyally.

It is also an advance strike on a clear witness in Mueller's investigation. McCabe corroborating Comeys memos.

Like all Trump's stupid moves, this is going to blow up in his face.

McCabe is challenging the move in court and has lined attorney's.

It will be interesting what the WH and Sessions is required to turn over around their communications and reasoning for the firing.

LOL.

McCabe corroborating Comey's memos? You listen too much to the liberal entertainment channels and idiots.
Comey said he was alone with Trump so McCabe's 'corroboration' is 'Comey told me so'. LOL

More of these democrat criminals are going to be fired...enjoy the ride.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: howtonhawky

the point of the verse was to show that the rebel rousing could be backfiring.

And who is Rebel Rousing?

Sure Rebel Rousing, (code word for seeking justice for wrongdoing). You could be locked up for rebel rousing in many countries.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: soberbacchus

McCabe is challenging the move in court and has lined attorney's.

Do you have a link for that? Seems to me he has a serious uphill battle in court.

TheRedneck

I believe what you say is true, however provided that McCabe can be protected sufficiently he will sing like a canary. Probably give up His former boss for lieing to Congress among many other things. He could get a new ID, get out of jail free card and perhaps some of his lost pension if he cooperates enough.

This makes a real mess for the Special Council so you can believe it’s a major power move.

On a related note I hope that they remembered to terminate his security clearances.

a reply to: Willtell

Did you hear his swan song on T.V. He's already playing the martyr. I wish that they had let him retire with his pension, just so they could bargain for part of it, against him serving several more years in the slammer, when he's found guilty in a Court for what he pulled, or for knowing what his subordinates pulled. That way, he'd just be one more disgraced public servant, and no one would ever look at him as being honorable again.

Will Tell, I bet you'd be up for putting together a Go Fund Me acc't for McCabe, now that big bad ol' Trump has stabbed him in his back, right? The Gov't did let the Statute of Limitations run out on Clapper's lying to Congress, and now he's leading the Amen chorus for both Comey and McCabe.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Pyle

What do you expect?

Knowing Sessions the way I do, and seeing that he is on the case now, a laundry list of charges for prosecution.

It's nice to see the old Jeff back... the little bulldog with gator teeth.

TheRedneck

If there was a laundry list of charges they wouldn't have fired him over "Lack of Candor". You should dig into what that means.

First things first, Brah.

How would it look if he could still collect his pension in prison?

Since your federal pension can be revoked for committing a crime while on the job. I would say they have nothing on him criminally.

Either you didn't read what you typed or you are delusional. I am leaning toward thinking it is the latter at the moment.

Please explain instead of insulting. They went the route they did because they dont have a criminal case against him and this was the only way to take away his pension.

The criminal case against him, and others will materialize when the IG Report is released. Then we'll see if Sessions is awake with hammer in hand.

Which begs the question if he did criminal things and that they know about them why wasnt he fired months ago for them instead they fire him for administrative reasons at last min before his full pension kicks.